To Be Vaccinated or NOT To Be Vaccinated? That is the Question.
Comments
-
Children have become lab rats.
-
Just like the rest of America and "peoples" of the world. What's new? CM
-
Let's not go to this man, Carlson, the new P. C. Richards. Make your case without him (or them). CM
-
Let's not go to this man, Carlson, the new P. C. Richards. Make your case without him (or them). CM
Yeah ... when you don't like the message, just hush-up or "kill" the messenger ... great advice, CM 😇
-
Vaccine passports, ETC. Please read this...
Dr. Michael Yeadon, Pfizer's former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory who spent 32 years in the industry-leading new medicines research and retired from the pharmaceutical giant with “the most senior research position” in his field, spoke with LifeSiteNews.
He addressed the “demonstrably false” propaganda from governments in response to COVID-19, including the “lie” of dangerous variants, the totalitarian potential for “vaccine passports,” and the strong possibility we are dealing with a “conspiracy” which could lead to something far beyond the carnage experienced in the wars and massacres of the 20th century.
His main points included: There is “no possibility” current variants of COVID-19 will escape immunity. It is “just a lie...”
Yet, governments around the world are repeating this lie, indicating that we are witnessing not just “convergent opportunism,” but a “conspiracy.” Meanwhile media outlets and Big Tech platforms are committed to the same propaganda and the censorship of the truth.
Pharmaceutical companies have already begun to develop unneeded “top-up” (“booster”) vaccines for the “variants.” The companies are planning to manufacture billions of vials, in addition to the current experimental COVID-19 “vaccine” campaign.
Regulatory agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, have announced that since these “top-up” vaccines will be so similar to the prior injections which were approved for emergency use authorization, drug companies will not be required to “perform any clinical safety studies.”
Thus, this virtually means that design and implementation of repeated and coerced mRNA vaccines “go from the computer screen of a pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of millions of people, [injecting] some superfluous genetic sequence for which there is absolutely no need or justification.”
Why are they doing this? Since no benign reason is apparent, the use of vaccine passports along with a “banking reset” could issue in a totalitarianism unlike the world has ever seen. Recalling the evil of Stalin, Mao, and Hitler, “mass depopulation” remains a logical outcome.
Beware! Truth or fiction? CM
-
Hey folks .... please don't worry, get the 2nd shot to help the 1st one .....😡
-
things are getting weirder and weirder .... first this fellow mocked people who were skeptical about vaccination with the manipulating vaccine, then he dies a short time after his vaccination and writes his own obituary???
-
-
There still seem to be folks in some places not wanting to be turned into big-pharma guinea pigs
-
-
is this true and not fake news? CM
-
is this true and not fake news? CM
I am providing a link ... YOU can do with it and believe whatever suits your fancy
-
-
-
Welcome to the land of the slaves and home of the tyrants
-
Have a good look and listen of what this lady has to say in the TX state senate hearing a few days ago ...!!!!
-
"Vaccination" Tyranny and fascist regime working hand in hand ?
-
Wow! This is serious! CM
-
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/fulltext
COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness—the elephant (not) in the room
Vaccine efficacy is generally reported as a relative risk reduction (RRR). It uses the relative risk (RR)—ie, the ratio of attack rates with and without a vaccine—which is expressed as 1–RR. Ranking by reported efficacy gives relative risk reductions of 95% for the Pfizer–BioNTech, 94% for the Moderna–NIH, 90% for the Gamaleya, 67% for the J&J, and 67% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford vaccines. However, RRR should be seen against the background risk of being infected and becoming ill with COVID-19, which varies between populations and over time. Although the RRR considers only participants who could benefit from the vaccine, the absolute risk reduction (ARR), which is the difference between attack rates with and without a vaccine, considers the whole population. ARRs tend to be ignored because they give a much less impressive effect size than RRRs: 1·3% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford, 1·2% for the Moderna–NIH, 1·2% for the J&J, 0·93% for the Gamaleya, and 0·84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines.
-
-
what is this?????
-
-
-
oh oh oh ... vaccine actually counter-productive??
-
Have a look and a listen to the facts on vaccine related medical issues and deaths
-
-
This is chilling! Thanks, Wolfgang. CM
-
-
"Why would you use an experimental messenger rna therapy if you already have antibodies. it's a rhetorical question, obviously you wouldn't if you actually knew anything." ~Howling Mad
-
@HaoLinMad1 "Why would you use an experimental messenger rna therapy if you already have antibodies. it's a rhetorical question, obviously you wouldn't if you actually knew anything." ~Howling Mad
Hospice Chaplain sadly had a relative who recovered from COVID (had antibodies), but died soon after receiving experimental mRNA "vaccine".
Keep Smiling 😊
![[Deleted User]](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/fcddec765be35f238a0844bd23f54b59/?default=https%3A%2F%2Fvanillicon.com%2F8ce8323767a20f0f45db140c4cd2cea1_200.png&rating=g&size=200)
