To Be Vaccinated or NOT To Be Vaccinated? That is the Question.
Comments
-
@HaoLinMad1 posted:
"Why would you use an experimental messenger rna therapy if you already have antibodies. it's a rhetorical question, obviously you wouldn't if you actually knew anything." ~Howling Mad
Sometimes rhetorical questions receive responses.
According to the scientists who know about mRNA therapies, they used them against COVID because we DIDN'T have the antibodies necessary to fight the virus.
The therapies present to a vaccine recipient's body the spike protein that sits on the virus.
- Because it's the protein, the recipient's immune system develops antibodies to fight the virus so that, after sufficient time for antibody development, if the recipient encounters the virus itself - announced by the presence of those spike proteins - his or her immune system will fight it off.
- Because it's the protein in the vaccine and not the virus itself, the recipient doesn't get COVID.
The effectiveness of the mRNA vaccines is in the numbers. A stunning achievement that's saving lives across the country and around the world.
-
🔰 Over 10,000 COVID-19 infections among people who are fully vaccinated against the virus that causes the disease have been reported to a U.S. health agency by states.
● Through April 30, 10,262 so-called breakthrough infections were reported from 46 U.S. states and territories to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
● Approximately 10 percent of the patients required hospital care and 160, or 2 percent, died.
● Data indicate that about 3 in 10 hospitalized patients were admitted for a reason unrelated to COVID-19 or with no symptoms.
Join us here in ➣ @TheTrumpist
-
Business bans COVID-19 vaccinated customers | coronavirus | 9 News Australia
A hairdresser in Palm Beach has said she will not take any customers who have had the COVID vaccine due to the unknown health effects. Subscribe: https://bit.ly/2noaGhv Get more breaking news at: https://bit.ly/2nobVgF
-
The Dr. Fauci story continues ...
-
Dr. Fauci ... whom is he serving ?????
-
COVID-19 vaccine incentives include $1M, full college scholarships
WOW ... vaccines for which bribes are needed to seduce people ????
-
You have numbers that show it’s working? I’d love to see them.
Here’s a quote from a doctor: https://www.instagram.com/p/CPau8AUle9e/
-
-
-
Globalist manipulators slowly de-masked?
-
About 16 hours ago, Accuweather live news about COVID-19 included: => https://www.accuweather.com/en/health-wellness/live-news/covid-19-vaccine-usa-cases-and-daily-news-and-information/955277
16 HOURS AGO
Nursing homes still dealing with virus outbreaks, deaths
By Zachary Rosenthal, AccuWeather staff writer
Despite many elderly Americans being fully vaccinated against COVID-19, nursing homes across the country are still dealing with coronavirus outbreaks, The Associated Press reported, according to The Associate Press. The outbreaks in these nursing homes, which are smaller and less frequent than during the pandemic’s height, are largely being blamed on unvaccinated staff members. Nursing home deaths are down from their peak, 10,675 during the first two weeks of January. Still, 472 coronavirus deaths were tied to nursing homes during the first two weeks of May. “There is this notion among some that vaccines were administered in long-term care, so we’re done, and that would be a perilous mistake,” said Dr. David Gifford, chief medical officer for the American Health Care Association, a national nursing home trade association, in a statement. The threat of outbreaks is increased by low rates of vaccination in health care workers, the CDC has warned.
Why does COVID-19 vaccination need incentives ?
1 DAY AGO
Free beer, free guns among the latest vaccination incentives
By Andrew Tavani, AccuWeather staff writer
The incentives for Americans to get vaccinated against COVID-19 keep coming. Free guns and free beer nationwide, to those of legal drinking age, are among the latest. Anheuser-Busch, the brewer of Budweiser, on Tuesday announced that it was partnering with the White House on its “Let’s Grab a Beer” initiative. “When the nation reaches the White House’s goal of 70% of adults partially vaccinated, Anheuser-Busch will buy America’s next round of beer, seltzer, non-alcoholic beverage or other A-B product,” the company said in a statement. The deadline for the 70% mark to trigger the free beer giveaway is the Biden administration’s goal of July 4. If the nation reaches that milestone, then adults will “simply upload a picture of themselves in their favorite place to grab a beer” in order to be entered to receive the free beverage.
Meanwhile, in West Virginia, officials are enticing people to get vaccinated by offering up the chance to wins some free guns along with a $1.588 million prize and some scholarships. The sweepstakes are set to begin on Father’s Day later this month and run through August 4. “The faster we get people across the finish line the more lives we save. That’s all there is to it,” West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice said. The governor said the free guns would be custom hunting rifles and custom hunting shotguns. For more on the free beer giveaway, watch the video below.
1 DAY AGO
Krispy Kreme has given away 1.5 million doughnuts through COVID-19 vaccination promotion
By Adriana Navarro, AccuWeather staff writer
After announcing it would be giving away a free doughnut to anyone who showed a COVID-19 Vaccination Record Card starting back in late March, Krispy Kreme has given away 1.5 million doughnuts as of June 1, according to ABC 7 News. The promotion continues through the rest of 2021 and guests qualify for the doughnut if they have received at least one of the two shots, or just the one shot of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. Each individual who requests the COVID-19 offer will be limited to one doughnut per day with no purchase required, according to the Krispy Kreme website.
Really wonder about unvaccinated threat: (hypothesis is vaccinated people producing spike protein toxins is real threat to many lives)
3 DAYS AGO
Unvaccinated people pose a threat to each other in Memorial Day crowds, expert says
By Lauren Fox, AccuWeather staff writer
While vaccinated individuals "should feel very well protected” according to CNN medical analyst Dr. Leana Wen, unvaccinated people in large crowds over Memorial Day weekend can pose a threat to each other. "Those who remain at risk are those who are unvaccinated," Wen said, according to CNN. "And that includes children who are not yet eligible to be vaccinated as well as adults who just have not been vaccinated yet.” In addition, people who are severely immunocompromised may be at risk regardless if they have received the vaccine or not. To incentivize vaccinations for people hitting the beach this weekend, New Jersey launched the "Shots at the Shore” program, where people heading to the Jersey shore can receive any of the vaccines given emergency approval in the U.S. New York City also posted buses offering COVID-19 vaccinations at beaches and parks over the weekend. "Go, get vaccinated, hit the beach. Real simple,” New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio said.
Keep Smiling 😊
-
-
-
-
The Tests: The Achilles Heel of the COVID-19 House of Cards
Global Research, June 06, 2020
Mondialisation.ca
Url of this article:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-tests-the-achilles-heel-of-the-covid-19-house-of-cards/5714325
blob:https://christiandiscourse.net/9b529fbb-010a-4032-bf9f-5d8276f998f6“The tool is not the problem, it’s what we do with it.”
– Tests which are not reliable!
– False negatives (real patients not detected).
– False positives (patients who are not positive)
– Tests that detect fragments of the virus and not the virus itself!
– Tests that don’t quantify the viral load, the most important thing…
– Test kits infected with the virus itself: you could catch it by getting tested!
So, you’ve been tested? Negative? Positive?
Maybe you’re like most people, eager to find out if you’ve got it or better yet, prove that you’re immune to the VID thing.
With this article, I don’t want to add a layer of fear to the pandemic of panic spread by our dear media in recent months.
Nevertheless, even if some people don’t want to “know anything” and will do whatever they are told to do [1]:
E.g. Wear a mask everywhere all the time, stay away from your family and friends, don’t dare to go out or take public transport without your “armour and visor”, don’t dare to touch anything without wearing gloves stuck to the skin as a result of sweating… Etc.
I think that looking for more truth and getting closer to the truth is the best antidote to fear.
So, these tests! what are they
Introduction: Diagnosing COVID-19 disease
People confuse the disease with the agent accused of causing it.
COVID-19 refers to the disease characterized by “airway involvement” with a wide variety of symptom patterns (see below).
It is caused by a virus, SARS-CoV-2, of the coronavirus family [2], SARS for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome.
Another coronavirus of this type, SARS-CoV-1, had already occurred in 2003, less contagious but more dangerous (in terms of mortality).
FIRST, On the one hand, you have a disease marked by the existence of signs or symptoms [3]. [No be confused with the causative virus]
The diagnosis is clinical!
Major signs/symptoms :
1. Cough
2. Dyspnea (difficulty breathing)
3. Chest pain
4. Anosmia (loss of sense of smell)
5. Dysgeusia (taste abnormality) with no other apparent cause.
Minor signs/symptoms :
1. Fever
2. Muscle aches and pains
3. Fatigue
4. Rhinitis (cold)
5. Sore throat
6. Headaches
7. Anorexia (loss of appetite and weight loss)
8. Acute confusion
9. Acute confusion
10. Sudden fall without apparent cause
As you can see, it’s a bit of everything and anything.
A little fever and a troubled sense of smell (which can be caused by a zinc deficiency) and hop, you’re clinically suspect of COVID-19.
SECOND, On the other hand, you are diagnosed as having the “causative virus”, SARS-CoV-2, linked to this clinical picture with possibly (severe forms) a severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) that can lead to hospitalization or even admission to the intensive care unit.
The main technique used around the world, in hospitals as well as by general practitioners and/or mobile screening centres, to detect the presence of the virus is called RT-PCR. This technique confirms the presence of SARS-CoV-2 (a fragment actually), not the disease!
Tests for the diagnosis of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus
1- RT-PCR
For Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction, invented in 1985 by the Nobel Prize in Chemistry (1993) Kary Mullis.
It is a machine capable of detecting the smallest amount of DNA or RNA (nucleic acids) present in the cell being studied. It detects and then amplifies the detected material, much like a photocopier-enhancer.
The material detected is RNA in the case of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus.
The primers specific to the genetic material of the virus under study, in this case SARS-CoV-2, are all that is needed to detect the slightest trace of it in the cells collected.
A few definitions before going any further:
– The sensitivity of the test is the ease with which the test identifies the target.
– The specificity of the test is the ability of the test to identify the target and not another one.
The ideal test is both highly sensitive (100%) and highly specific (100%).
Is RT-PCR highly sensitive and highly specific? It depends.
– False negatives: RT-PCR comes back negative for SARS-CoV-2 even though the patient is infected. The less sensitive the test is, the more false negatives will occur.
– False positive: RT-PCR comes back positive for SARS-CoV-2 when the patient is NOT infected. The less specific the test is, the more false positives will occur.
Can you imagine the possible dramatic consequences of such errors, in terms of contagion, contamination, improper containment or epidemiological evaluation?
In the literature [4], the PCR technique is called “rapid, sensitive and reproducible”.
For the WHO, our health institutes, most of the media, everything is fine.
However, it’s not all that idyllic!
The first disappointment is that RT-PCR does not detect the virus, but a genetic trace (RNA) of the virus, which is not the same thing.
A positive RT-PCR test does not necessarily indicate the presence of a complete virus. It is the complete, intact virus that is the transmissible actor of COVID-19.
As the FDA [based on CDC] admits [5], the detection of viral RNA by RT-PCR does not necessarily indicate an active viral infection (with clinical syndrome)!
A second disappointment is that RT-PCR cannot quantify the viral load since it artificially amplifies (multiplies) the detected genetic material. It only says whether the virus is present or not, and again, only traces of the virus, not the whole virus.
Third disappointment, the technique is complex and has many limitations! Even more so in detecting RNA viruses as in the case of SARS-CoV-2.
“The interpretation of PCR results is difficult. Any PCR must be performed on a good quality sample and adapted to the indication. For some viral infections, a positive PCR is not synonymous with disease… The dialogue between the clinician and the microbiologist is essential for a good diagnosis. “(RMS, 2007, Vol 3).
In most cases, the cells studied come from the upper respiratory tract, and are collected using a long cotton swab inserted into the nasal cavity at a relatively deep level [6]. It is said that to be effective, the procedure must be painful for the person being tested.
If the cells contain the smallest nucleic fragment (RNA) of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, the theory is that it will be detected by RT-PCR. But not that the patient is necessarily sick with COVID-19!
In this article from the Swiss Medical Journal of 2005 [7], we read that :
“For some infections, PCR tests are considered as a reference method while for others, they are only an aid to diagnosis. Contact with the laboratory performing the analysis is important in order to interpret the PCR results correctly.”
For respiratory infections,
“Serology (blood test – see below) remains the definitive proof of an infection that has caused an immune response and is therefore still considered…as a reference test.”
For coronaviruses, culture is difficult and detection by RT-PCR is the technique of choice.
But many steps are required to prime and amplify the specific genetic material and it is a complex and very sophisticated process with many opportunities for misinterpretation or misrepresentation [8] :
Mishandling, miscalibrated or contaminated equipment (from the person being tested, the laboratory technician or the environment), misstorage or misdirection and the whole result can be compromised.
PCR tests can be falsified when the sample is contaminated with other strains, especially bacterial strains.
There is a significant risk of false negatives, as reported on the Alternative Well-Being website [9] :
1- The test is badly done
2- The virus is elsewhere (not in the site where the sample is taken)
3- The tests have not been approved
4- The virus is already mutating
There is an even higher risk of false positives, as pointed out by the independent journalist Pryska Ducoeurjoly [10], based on the Swiss Medical Journal (8 April 2020) and the French journal Prescrire [11].
2- Rapid antigenic test
A variant of PCR, the results of which may take 24 to 48 hours to be known, is a faster antigenic test (results in 15 minutes), certified by the Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products in Belgium [12]. It allows the detection of antigens (viral proteins), again from a nasopharyngeal swab.
However, it is much less specific!
In one study, only 50% of patients confirmed positive by RT-PCR were detected by this antigenic test.
This test is not recommended by the WHO for the detection of COVID-19 disease.
That says it all.
Tests for confirmation of viral infection and its follow-up
1- Serological tests
These tests are based on a blood test followed by an analysis in a specialized laboratory.
We look for the presence of antibodies developed by the patient. This is used to find out whether the person has actually been in contact with SARS-CoV-2 (IgM) and whether they have become immune to it (IgG).
This is the test that many Belgians are eagerly awaiting and which will be reserved in priority for care personnel.
2- ELISA tests
These special serological tests (dozens of samples processed at one time) are carried out in university laboratories to monitor the evolution of antibodies over time and to assess the type and duration of immunity induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection.
What is the cost of these tests in Belgium?
1. For the molecular detection test (PCR), the RIZIV reimburses 46.81 EUR.
2. For the antigen detection test, the RIZIV reimburses 16.72 EUR.
3. For the antibody detection test (serological test), the RIZIV reimburses 9,60 EUR.
These amounts include all costs related to the test: sampling material, equipment, reagents, investment costs, quality monitoring, personnel costs, supervision, protective material, transport costs, etc.
There is no patient co-payment (no co-payment) [13].
Infected specimen collection kits!
As if that were not enough, we learn that batches of detection kits are infected with SARS-CoV-2!
Notably in the USA [14], Quebec [15], UK [16], Africa (Tanzania) [17]…
“As the new coronavirus began to spread across the country, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) sent contaminated test kits to the states in early February, according to a federal investigation.”
“Thousands of swabs ordered by Quebec City to test for COVID-19 were found to be potentially contaminated... Fungal contamination was found on several swabs. According to Nicolas Vigneault, spokesperson for the Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux, the swabs came from a shipment received from China.”
“One batch of coronavirus tests, out of the millions expected by the UK, has been contaminated by the virus itself. The British government had ordered batches of tests for coronavirus from a laboratory. But one of these was infected by … Covid-19 itself,” the Telegraph explains, without giving any explanation as to why this unfortunate contamination occurred. The delivery of these tests was immediately cancelled.”
“The Tanzanian President believes that the coronavirus epidemic is not yet on the scale of the official figures. According to him, the data on Covid-19 are being doctored by alarmist authorities, he denounced in his speech… He claims to have himself secretly tested a goat, a quail and a papaya, but to his astonishment the results were positive. He therefore questions the reliability of the tests. These positive results on animals and even plants are, for him, proof that people declared positive for the virus might not actually be carriers. This would mean that the real situation is not as alarming in Tanzania.”
That’s a lot of mistakes, all over the world, don’t you think?
Strange, the lack of coverage in major Western media.
It’s very serious though, and it calls into question the whole campaign of massive screening for this coronavirus.
The opinion of an international expert
John P. A. Ioannidis is not just anyone on the international medical scene.
“John P. A. Ioannidis is a professor of medicine and a researcher at Stanford University’s School of Medicine and School of Humanity and Science. Director of the Stanford Prevention Research Center, he is co-director, with Steven N. Ioannidis, of the Stanford Prevention Research Center. Goodman, the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford. “[18].
He is one of the most recognized specialists in health epistemology.
He is adamant:
“As the coronavirus pandemic unfolds, we’re making decisions without reliable data.” [19]
It confirms that the PCR tests used in the COVID-19 crisis are not as reliable as that, despite the efforts of the media and our health institutes (Sciensano in Belgium) to make us believe so.
See his interview : Perspectives on the Pandemic | Dr. John Ioannidis Update: 4.17.20, at minute 27 for his comments on PCR testing in the context of COVID-19.
In summary
What a fiasco.
The diagnostic tests represented above all by RT-PCR, a gene amplification technique, are far from having the expected reliability, which is crucial in a crisis such as the one we are going through.
Even if positive, the RT-PCR test only reveals an RNA fragment of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, not the COVID-19 disease itself. In order to say that, we need a corresponding clinical picture! All other pathologies of the patient must be considered and if the patient dies, they must be taken into account before attributing death to COVID-19!
This is frightening when you imagine the possible unjustified consequences of decisions made on the basis of these tests!
– Confinement/quarantine
– Unprecedented freedom-destroying measures
– Hospital and health centre upheavals
– Serious diagnoses may be wrongly given to terrorized people who are actually in good health.
– Social distancing with heavy consequences on human relations
– Major economic and social impact, the real scope of which is currently unknown
– Suspension of all social activities (schools, restaurants, leisure activities)
– Whole population tracking and policing projects
I think that in the face of so much self-sustained insanity, despite the widespread virus of fear, the best antidote is to stay calm.
Come to your senses.
Reassess the true extent of this disease (mortality below 3% [of positive cases] as of May 26, 2020- [20]).
The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus will have to take its rightful place among all other health problems, no more, no less.
And we, may we quickly live again without masks, without social distance and without laws which threaten civil rights.
And learn from so many mistakes.
Dr. Pascal Sacré
Translation by Maya from the French original published by Mondialisation.ca
Notes:
[1] Wear a mask everywhere all the time, stay away from your family and friends, don’t dare to go out or take public transport without your armour and visor, don’t dare to touch anything without wearing gloves stuck to the skin by perspiration…
[2] Coronaviruses Coronaviruses (CoVs) are a large family of viruses that cause symptoms ranging from the common cold to more serious illnesses such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). World Health Organization (WHO).
[3] PRISE EN CHARGE D’UN PATIENT POSSIBLE OU CONFIRMÉ DE COVID-19
[4] PCR en microbiologie : de l’amplification de l’ADN à l’interprétation du résultat, Revue Médicale Suisse, RMS 106, 2007, Vol 3
[5] FAQs on Testing for SARS-CoV-2 U.S. Food and Drug Administration FDA
[6] Tutoriel prélèvement nasopharyngé : Un geste technique, essentiel à la fiabilité du test COVID-19
[7] Détection et quantification des acides nucléiques en infectiologie : utilité, certitudes et limites « Nous présentons ici une revue de l’utilité des techniques PCR pour identifier les pathogènes les plus courants ainsi que des commentaires permettant de guider l’interprétation de ces résultats dans un contexte clinique. », Revue Médicale Suisse, RMS 13, 2005, Vol 1
[8] The Inconsistences of Quantitative Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction in Diagnostics Microbiology Acta Scientific Microbiology Vol 1 Issue 2 February 2018
[9] 4 explications à l’échec des TESTS du Covid-19 , 9 avril 2020
[10] Tests du covid-19, attention aux faux positifs !, Pryska Ducoeurjoly 5 mai 2020
[11] Valeur prédictive des résultats des tests diagnostiques : l’exemple des tests covid-19 23 avril 2020
[12] COVID-19 : le dépistage Le test a été développé par le Laboratoire Hospitalier Universitaire de Bruxelles, le LHUB – ULB : un des cinq plus grands laboratoires hospitaliers universitaires en Europe, à la pointe en matière de biologie clinique.
[13] Remboursement des tests de détection du Coronavirus pendant la pandémie de Covid-19
[14] Les tests de dépistage fournis par les centres de contrôle aux USA étaient infectés par le Covid-19
[15] Des milliers d’écouvillons importés de Chine par Québec sont inutilisables. D’autres provinces signalent des tests de dépistage contaminés. 22 avril 2020
[16] Coronavirus. Des tests de dépistage commandés par le Royaume-Uni contaminés par le Covid-19
[17] Tanzanie, Coronavirus : le Président John Magufuli dénonce des « statistiques trafiquées et revues à la hausse » 4 mai 2020
[18] John P. A. Ioannidis
[19] Un fiasco en devenir? Alors que la pandémie de coronavirus s’installe, nous prenons des décisions sans données fiables Nous manquons de preuves fiables sur le nombre de personnes infectées par le SRAS-CoV-2 ou qui continuent de l’être.
[20] Le coronavirus (COVID-19) – Faits et chiffres, 26 mai 2020
Wolfgang,
Have you seen this? Tell me it's not true? CM
-
Wolfgang,
Have you seen this? Tell me it's not true? CM
I have not seen this and have not read it either because it is FAAAAAAR too lengthy for me to want to read it
As far as PCR tests are concerned, I have read already in early March 2020 that this "test" is not worth a lousy thing for diagnostics ... simple reason for that is that the method was not even designed for doing any diagnostic work. In addition it is so damn faulty that it proves basically nothing in terms of identifying a "virus". It's a hoax ... that has been put in the hands of politics puppets in order to tyrannize people on a global scale and have the mains... media pull the wool over people's heads.
Slowly perhaps some are waking up as they compare plain numbers from years past with 2020 and 2021 and realize that health wise there has been nothing unusually dangerous or medically alarming ... all the panic prophecies by the criminal heads (such as Drosten and Fauci) never came to pass ... sure sign of being flat-out lies and designed criminal activity on the globalist's agenda list.
-
-
Insane Dr. Fauci gets a good share for his non-sense. Finally someone nails this criminal to his chair.
-
Just believe the "good news" of Dr. Fauci and be vaccinated as he suggests 90 % of the citizens must be before any liberties or rights can be theirs again .....
-
-
-
-
Public problem culprit ...????
Dr. Fauci .... why is this fellow (or is it felon?) not behind bars?? what has happened to the country said to be the land of the free and the home of the brave?? 😪😪
-
Dear all, I don’t know if you are aware of the mess happening in Italy with AZ. a girl died yesterday, 18yo, thrombosis and brain hemorrhage.“
„In Italy some regions had organized a "AZ vaccination open day" to use all the doses, and they were meant for the younger.“
„Now they are all fighting one against the other, they keep saying that the kids "volunteered" so they have no fault.“
„And now the people who had the 1st AZ jab don't know if they should go ahead with the 2nd. and there are no safety proof that they can mix and use another vax for the 2nd jab.“
„a HUGE fight is happening between politicians, scientific committee, Governors... I bought 🍿 and now I want to see how they come out of this. and I DO hope that the family of this poor girl will sue all of them.“
-
-
BREAKING NEWS: Unbelievable Increase In Shot Deaths This Week! CDC Linked VAERS Tracking Website Reported!
-
Anyone slowly waking up yet? or still in their brainwashed stupor ?
-
-
Read it as many times as needed until you understand what it says!!
-
![[Deleted User]](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/fcddec765be35f238a0844bd23f54b59/?default=https%3A%2F%2Fvanillicon.com%2F8ce8323767a20f0f45db140c4cd2cea1_200.png&rating=g&size=200)
