New News to An Old Truth: World Trade Towels

C D Posters,

Time is a revealer of truth!

Here is proof that the World Trade Center Towels didn't collapsed solely to the two planes crashing into them. I am definitely sure, with certainty. I was suspicious before, but now, my suspicion was confirmed. Proof, you say? Watch the video (below) -- a "Control Demolition" of the Trump Plaza Casino, in N. J., two days ago (A failed business and businessman). One can't help, but see similarities in the two collapses. It is clear (minus the smoke) for all to see! A line from a Marx Brothers film, "Who you gonna believeme or your lying eyes?" That is, do you trust, the so-called, findings of the 9/11 Commission Report?

I still want to know after all these years:

  1. Who authorized the Controlled collapses?
  2. Who carried out the destructive deed?
  3. Are they liable for any of the deaths?
  4. When were the explosives laid?
  5. Who financed it?
  6. Were there something someone wanted to hide?
  7. Where is the insurance money today? Who got the lion share?
  8. Why was the American people misled?
  9. Should the 9/11 Commission Report be believed?
  10. Where are the jet engines? One may have been found. How many engines were there on the two planes? Is it possible that the heat temperature were so high to melt a jet engine? If so, wouldn't this require some type of thermodynamics?

At best, 9/11 Commission Report should be revised to include the answers to the questions I raised above. They owe it to the many families who loss loved ones. The American people deserves the whole truth. For those you who have loss loved ones, I feel your pain, but let truth have her say. Don't put your head in the sand. Let truth speak to reality and the obvious. All reasonable responses are welcome. For many families this chapter remains opened. CM


Comments

  • Bill_ColeyBill_Coley Posts: 2,204

    @C Mc posted:

    Here is proof that the World Trade Center Towels didn't collapsed solely to the two planes crashing into them. I am definitely sure, with certainty. I was suspicious before, but now, my suspicion was confirmed. Proof, you say? Watch the video (below) -- a "Control Demolition" of the Trump Plaza Casino, in N. J., two days ago (A failed business and businessman). One can't help, but see similarities in the two collapses. It is clear (minus the smoke) for all to see! A line from a Marx Brothers film, "Who you gonna believeme or your lying eyes?" That is, do you trust, the so-called, findings of the 9/11 Commission Report?

    In my view, our perception of "similarities" between the collapses of the Trump casino and the WTC towers provide "proof" of nothing other than the content of our perceptions. You're of course welcome to conclude that the similarities you perceive prove whatever you think they prove. But your apparent conviction that the rest of us "can't help but see" the "similarities" you do, and, I assume, from them draw the same conclusions as you, I view as an indefensible reach. I for one assure you that nothing in the collapse of the Trump casino prompts me to question anything about 9/11 Commission's explanation of the collapses of the WTC towers.

    And since at least nine of the ten questions you propose at the end of your post assume that your "suspicion" about the WTC towers has in fact been proven, when in my view, no such proof exists, I disagree with your contention that the 9/11 Commission's report should be "revised" to provide answers to them. For example, how could the Commission "revise" its report about the collapses to answer the question "who authorized the controlled collapses?" without ALSO revising its report to conclude that such "controlled collapses" actually occurred? Your revision request doesn't just seek answers to questions; it asks the Commission to reverse some of its core findings. That's not going to happen... because the evidence doesn't support such reversals.

  • WolfgangWolfgang Posts: 3,028

    In my view, our perception of "similarities" between the collapses of the Trump casino and the WTC towers provide "proof" of nothing other than the content of our perceptions.

    These similarities just show a triple coincidence with very very slim chances of happening ...

    For example, how could the Commission "revise" its report about the collapses to answer the question "who authorized the controlled collapses?" without ALSO revising its report to conclude that such "controlled collapses" actually occurred?

    The revision should start by the admission that it was a "fixed up" government controlled and essentially dictated undertaking with heavy manipulation from the start ...

    It's all very simple ...

  • reformedreformed Posts: 3,013

    Common ground. These theories have been debunked time and time again.

  • WolfgangWolfgang Posts: 3,028

    Common ground. These theories have been debunked time and time again.

    Problem is that some of "these" are not theories (as the debunkers on the official story line have claimed and would like you to believe ... simple facts are in plain sight !!

  • reformedreformed Posts: 3,013

    The controlled demolition conspiracy is, in fact, a debunked theory.

  • WolfgangWolfgang Posts: 3,028

    The controlled demolition conspiracy is, in fact, a debunked theory.

    Like I said ... there just were innumerable coincidences that the WTC towers and building 7 collapsed the way they did ... demolition experts couldn't have done the demolition any better. But then, without the official idea of an Osama conspiracy with 13 carpet knife armed terrorits, there would not have been thousands of innocent deaths nor the start of the tyrannical police state rule subjecting the USA to what has become of "the land of the free and home of the brave" ...

  • WolfgangWolfgang Posts: 3,028

    Name one "coincidence"

    A building collapsing right into its footprint in the particular manner as seen in the case of three buildings (one of which not even impacted from outside cause ... a rather very slim possibility to happen

  • WolfgangWolfgang Posts: 3,028

    Based on what?

    based on knowledge from experiences over centuries

    (a) how buildings collapse when hit or brought down from an outside source of power ... they tip over, large parts remain standing with other parts just falling off, etc ...

    (b) how buildings can be made to collapse completely and do so right into their footprint

  • reformedreformed Posts: 3,013

    So what other event like 9/11 happened to make that comparison?

  • WolfgangWolfgang Posts: 3,028

    So what other event like 9/11 happened to make that comparison?

    Any controlled demolition of towers or large high buildings shows the same manner of collapse as was seen with the WTC towers ... a recent one was mentioned in the initial post in this thread ...

  • reformedreformed Posts: 3,013

    Except none of those had planes slam into buildings so they are not comparable.

  • WolfgangWolfgang Posts: 3,028

    Except none of those had planes slam into buildings so they are not comparable.

    Neither did WTC 7 ...

    Furthermore, the planes crashing into a building from the side would not have caused a collapse as seen ... and neither would fires (since other towers have experienced bigger and hotter fires and yet their metal structure components did not collapse

  • reformedreformed Posts: 3,013

    No, but WTC7 DID have a catastrophic event that would be categorically different than the other instances you cited.

  • WolfgangWolfgang Posts: 3,028

    No, but WTC7 DID have a catastrophic event that would be categorically different than the other instances you cited.

    which catastrophic event did the building WTC7 have??

    WTC 1&2 according to ilm material had an impact planes of planes (which upon hitting the buildings disintegrated into seemingly nothing ?) hitting them high up and causing fires over several floors, which catastrophic event did WTC7 have??

  • C McC Mc Posts: 3,735

    Brethren,

    I wonder why they didn't use a plane instead of dynamite demolish Trump Casino since you believe it was not a control demolition that brought down those buildings minutes apart? CM

Sign In or Register to comment.