Whose President ???
Comments
-
Again, @Wolfgang all of the 9/11 conspiracies are EASILY debunked. https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a6384/debunking-911-myths-world-trade-center/
-
@reformed , those pictures to which you linked above show nothing that is in any way close to what a wreckagee of an airliner looks like when it crashes into the ground ....
I happen to know first hand what it looks like, saw it in the case of the PanAm crash at Lockerbie, Scotland in Dec 1988 when we passed by the scene in the car a day after it happened.
Also, there has never been an official proper investigation into the crashes of the four airliners as normally would have to be conducted according to normal airliner accidents investigation procedures ... instead TV stations seem to have known what happened only minutes after the first WTC tower was hit, who was the culprit and responsible for the disaster.
-
Here's another article by the alleged "conspiracy theorist" P. C. Roberts, published on 09/11/2019 with some information put in very simple terms to be rather easily understood ....
And, please, the point that determines truth or error is not about how many scientists claim something or how many media proclaim something ... rather each individual is responsible for their own lives and what and who they want to believe and trust, and they should thus use their God given abilities of reason and logic to evaluate what makes sense and what doesn't.
-
Here's an interesting article by an American author, involving some very interesting linguistic background information of things that happened in advance of the WTC-Pentagon attacks in September 2001
From the narrative of the author:
5. 9/11. This is the key usage that has reverberated down the years around which the others revolve. It is an anomalous numerical designation applied to an historical event, and obviously also the emergency telephone number. Try to think of another numerical appellation for an important event in American history. It’s impossible. But if you have a good historical sense, you will remember that the cornerstone for the Pentagon was lain on September 11, 1941, three months before the attack on Pearl Harbor, and that the CIA engineered a coup against the Allende government in Chile on Sept 11, 1973. Just strange coincidences? The future editor of The New York Times and Iraq war promoter, Bill Keller, introduced the emergency phone connection on the morning of September 12th in a NY Times op-ed piece, “America’s Emergency Line: 911.” The linkage of the attacks to a permanent national emergency was thus subliminally introduced, as Keller mentioned Israel nine times and seven times compared the U.S. situation to that of Israel as a target for terrorists. His first sentence reads: “An Israeli response to America’s aptly dated wake-up call might well be, ‘Now you know.’” By referring to September 11 as 9/11, an endless national emergency fear became wedded to an endless war on terror aimed at preventing Hitler-like terrorists from obliterating us with nuclear weapons that could create another ground zero or holocaust. Mentioning Israel (“America is proud to be Israel’s closest ally and best friend in the world,” George W. Bush would tell the Israeli Knesset) so many times, Keller was not very subtly performing an act of legerdemain with multiple meanings. By comparing the victims of the 11 September attacks to Israeli “victims,” he was implying, among other things, that the Israelis are innocent victims who are not involved in terrorism, but are terrorized by Palestinians, as Americans are terrorized by fanatical Muslims. Palestinians/Al-Qaeda. Israel/U.S. Explicit and implicit parallels of the guilty and the innocent. Keller tells us who the real killers are. His use of the term 9/11 is a term that pushes all the right buttons, evoking unending social fear and anxiety. It is language as sorcery. It is propaganda at its best. Even well-respected critics of the U.S. government’s explanation use the term that has become a fixture of public consciousness through endless repetition. As George W. Bush would later put it, as he connected Saddam Hussein to “9/11” and pushed for the Iraq war, “We don’t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud.” All the ingredients for a linguistic mind-control smoothie had been blended.
I have concluded – and this is impossible to prove definitively because of the nature of such propagandistic techniques – that the use of all these words/numbers is part of a highly sophisticated linguistic mind-control campaign waged to create a narrative that has lodged in the minds of hundreds of millions of people and is very hard to dislodge.
...
The evidence for linguistic mind control, while the subject of this essay, does not stand alone, of course. It underpins the actual attacks of September 11 and the subsequent anthrax attacks that are linked. The official explanations for these events by themselves do not stand up to elementary logic and are patently false, as proven by thousands of well-respected professional researchers from all walks of life – i.e. engineers, pilots, scientists, architects, and scholars from many disciplines (see the upcoming 9/11 Unmasked: An International Review Panel Investigation by David Ray Griffin and Elizabeth Woodworth, to be released September 11, 2018). To paraphrase the prescient Vince Salandria, who said it long ago concerning the government’s assassination of President Kennedy, the attacks of 2001 are “a false mystery concealing state crimes.” If one objectively studies the 2001 attacks together with the language adopted to explain and preserve them in social memory, the “mystery” emerges from the realm of the unthinkable and becomes utterable. “There is no mystery.” The truth becomes obvious.
-
what role did the so-called "Dancing Israelis" have in the events of September 11, 2001?
-
@Wolfgang posted:
Here's an interesting article by an American author, involving some very interesting linguistic background information of things that happened in advance of the WTC-Pentagon attacks in September 2001
Another collection of unsubstantiated tabloid-worthy assertions of fact and speculation. The author distinguishes himself from other creators of such collections, however, when he acknowledges that his unfounded speculation is "impossible to prove definitively." Kudos to him for that amount of candor. A few of those kudos must be taken back, sadly, because the author fails to acknowledge that the reason his speculation is so hard to prove is that there is no factual basis for it.
-
The author distinguishes himself from other creators of such collections, however, when he acknowledges that his unfounded speculation is "impossible to prove definitively." Kudos to him for that amount of candor.
The authors of the offical fairy tale story haven't gotten to that point yet of admitting that their propaganda can't be proven and that their narratives is unreasonable and illogical and contradicting known evidence such as what happens with high-risers when they are blown up in a controlled demolition operation ... 😉
-
Never a proper investigation? How do you figure? And you don't know what it looks like when a plane is INTENTIONALLY flown into the ground. You are comparing apples to oranges.
TV stations knew what happened because they FILMED IT. They did not know who was the culprit minutes after the disaster.
-
Onec again USA air defense showed total incompetence ... 18 years after the first incident in September 2001. Some unlearned and untrained fellows were supposedly able to fly for almost half and hour in USA airspace after having become suspicious without the most fancy and most competent airforce and air defense systems able to do anything about it ... not even protecting their own headquarters. Anyone still believe this story ? Well 3 days ago, similar events unfolded in the heart of a foremost allied country of the USA ... and once again, the most sophisticated air-defense and most expensive USA military equipment was supposedly useless and unable to prevent drones fly for more than 1000km through heavily USA monitored airspace without being detected and shot down ???
Indeed unbelievable! Eh, Iran seems to have far better equipment in their hands ... a USA spy drone barely entered Iran airspace when it was stopped in its tracks ...
Seems more that SA and USA intentionally did not interfere with this attack on Saudi oil industry plant ... or are they really that incompetent and the USA military industrial complex is only producing non-working equipment for top-$??
![[Deleted User]](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/fcddec765be35f238a0844bd23f54b59/?default=https%3A%2F%2Fvanillicon.com%2F8ce8323767a20f0f45db140c4cd2cea1_200.png&rating=g&size=200)
