R. Kennedy assassination -- the official story vs what (truth or conspiracy theory) ?

WolfgangWolfgang Posts: 1,890
edited April 5 in News & Current Events

The CIA Takeover of America in the 1960s Is the Story of Our Times

A Lie Too Big To Fail: The Real History of the Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy, by Lisa Pease

A small excerpt from the article's opening section:

When Senator Robert Kennedy was assassinated on June 5, 1968, the American public fell into an hypnotic trance in which they have remained ever since. The overwhelming majority accepted what was presented by government authorities as an open and shut case that a young Palestinian American, Sirhan Sirhan, had murdered RFK because of his support for Israel, a false accusation whose ramifications echo down the years. That this was patently untrue and was contradicted by overwhelming evidence made no difference.

Sirhan did not kill Robert Kennedy, yet he remains in jail to this very day. Robert Kennedy, Jr., who was 14 years old at the time of his father’s death, has visited Sirhan in prison, claims he is innocent, and believes there was another gunman. Paul Schrade, an aide to the senator and the first person shot that night, also says Sirhan didn’t do it. Both have plenty of evidence. And they are not alone.

There is a vast body of documented evidence to prove this, an indisputably logical case marshalled by serious writers and researchers. Lisa Pease is the latest.

Do we as Christians just let official government and main stream media tells us and believe what they say? Or o we as Christians employ our own mind, reason and logic so as not to be fooled ?

Consider the following parts from that article, and consider how you approach situations such as these

Anyone who has looked closely and honestly at the evidence has realized that more than one person was involved in Robert Kennedy’s death. So why can’t reporters see this? Why can’t the media explain this? Because the media and the government are two sides of the same coin, and those who challenge the government’s version of history, as numerous reporters have found out, all too often lose status and sometimes whole careers. Kristina Borjesson published an anthology of such stories in her book Into the Buzzsaw, in which journalists describe how they lost their careers when each of them expressed a truth that the government did not want exposed.

...

Since more than one person was involved in the killing of RFK, there was – ipso facto – a conspiracy. This is not theory but fact. The fact of a conspiracy. For more than fifty years, mainstream reporters have been cowed by this word “conspiracy,” thanks to the CIA. Many others have been intelligence assets posing as journalists, regurgitating the lies. This is a fact.

...

What is amazing is that the obvious conclusion to such simple syllogistic logic (Sirhan in front, bullets in the back, therefore…) that a child could understand has been dismissed by the authorities for fifty-one years. The fact that the government authorities – the LAPD, the Sheriff’s Office, the District Attorney, federal and state government officials, the FBI, the CIA – have from the start so assiduously done all in their power to pin the blame on “a lone assassin,” Sirhan, proves they are part of a coordinated cover-up, which in turn suggests their involvement in the crime.

Comments

  • C_M_C_M_ Posts: 3,010
    edited April 5

    @CM responds to @Wolfgang post above:

    @Wolfgang,

    I know you love conspiracy theories, but is this a current event? Please, promise me, you're not going to conclude that a Jew or Jews had something to do with Bobby Kennedy's death? At any rate, enjoy yourself. CM

Sign In or Register to comment.