Republicans Ballot Fraud Case Comes to a Head in North Carolina
Mark Harris, the Republican in North Carolina got caught with ballot fraud. People of color and Dems are often accused but "white" people and Republicans are found guilty. It's clear that the political party that cries "wolf" is not always innocent. Will Mr. Harris be held accountable or weasel his way out with a sweaty charade? CM
Comments
-
Citation?
-
Citation for what?
Reformed, this is blatant fraud. Why don't you man-up and condemn what is seen my all. Even Harris' son warned his father. Don't be a political "hack". Harris got caught with his hand in the ballot box. Come on! CM
-
I'm asking for citation about this story. Link to an article, anything?
-
-
Today, the North Carolina board of elections voted unanimously to throw out the results of that state's disputed 9th congressional district election, and the GOP candidate in that election both called for a new election and withdrew from further electoral consideration.
Any objective reading of the evidence in that case concluded that a new election was called for, and that there were serious fraudulent actions taken in support of the Republican candidate.
On the bright side, at least now President Trump has proof of his endless claims of voter fraud.
-
Thanks for the link. This is interesting. And for the record, we already had proof of voter fraud in other places.
-
Reformed,
This is news to me! Share your proof with Bill.
@Bill said: "On the bright side, at least now President Trump has proof of his endless claims of voter fraud."
Your information may cause him to change his statement above.
Reformed, what you said above, is one thing, are you prepared to condemn, publicly with proof and now the link from, to denounce this NC shameful act of ballot fraud by Mark Harris? Yes or no? CM
-
@reformed said:
Thanks for the link. This is interesting. And for the record, we already had proof of voter fraud in other places.
Already have proof of voter fraud? Great. Please provide links to news accounts about the outcomes of the state or local boards of elections hearings that considered said proof.
I'm particularly hopeful that you will provide links to the hearings that heard proof of the president's claim that three million "illegals" voted in California, thereby greatly inflating Secretary Clinton's winning vote margin in that state in the 2016 general election.
-
How long will you have to wait for Reformed to come up with what doesn't exist? Why would one tenaciously defend the indefensible? CM
-
Less than 24 hours.
-
I will condemn the practice of the staff worker. I don't see evidence that the candidate was involved.
