It takes a village to raise a kid. And it takes a village to get them gunned down by lunatics

Dave_LDave_L Posts: 2,328
edited March 2018 in News & Current Events

What should the Christian response be to the senseless killing of children in schools by those with guns protected by law?

Post edited by Dave_L on

Comments

  • WolfgangWolfgang Posts: 2,026

    @Dave_L said:
    What should the Christian response be to the senseless killing of children in schools by those with guns protected by law?

    Sorry ... you got something terribly wrong there.
    The madman/terrorist/lunatic committing mass murder at a school is NOT protected by law ... he actually may be shot dead on the spot at any time in self-defense.

  • Dave_LDave_L Posts: 2,328

    @Wolfgang said:

    @Dave_L said:
    What should the Christian response be to the senseless killing of children in schools by those with guns protected by law?

    Sorry ... you got something terribly wrong there.
    The madman/terrorist/lunatic committing mass murder at a school is NOT protected by law ... he actually may be shot dead on the spot at any time in self-defense.

    Should we keep nuclear arms from public circulation? If so, why not move the line up slightly, and include guns designed specifically for killing the most amount of people in the least amount of time?

  • WolfgangWolfgang Posts: 2,026

    @Dave_L said:
    Should we keep nuclear arms from public circulation? If so, why not move the line up slightly, and include guns designed specifically for killing the most amount of people in the least amount of time?

    ?? ?? ?? ?? ...

  • Dave_LDave_L Posts: 2,328

    @Wolfgang said:

    @Dave_L said:
    Should we keep nuclear arms from public circulation? If so, why not move the line up slightly, and include guns designed specifically for killing the most amount of people in the least amount of time?

    ?? ?? ?? ?? ...

    Do you think people should have the right to bear nuclear arms?

  • WolfgangWolfgang Posts: 2,026

    @Dave_L said:
    Do you think people should have the right to bear nuclear arms?

    you are asking questions which have no bearing on anything and seem to indicate that you may have lost your mind ...

  • Dave_LDave_L Posts: 2,328

    @Wolfgang said:

    @Dave_L said:
    Do you think people should have the right to bear nuclear arms?

    you are asking questions which have no bearing on anything and seem to indicate that you may have lost your mind ...

    If you believe it is right to limit private ownership of nuclear arms, why not other arms designed to kill humans en masse?

  • dct112685dct112685 Posts: 1,111

    @Dave_L said:

    @Wolfgang said:

    @Dave_L said:
    What should the Christian response be to the senseless killing of children in schools by those with guns protected by law?

    Sorry ... you got something terribly wrong there.
    The madman/terrorist/lunatic committing mass murder at a school is NOT protected by law ... he actually may be shot dead on the spot at any time in self-defense.

    Should we keep nuclear arms from public circulation? If so, why not move the line up slightly, and include guns designed specifically for killing the most amount of people in the least amount of time?

    This is just a nonsense comparison.

    @Wolfgang said:

    @Dave_L said:
    Do you think people should have the right to bear nuclear arms?

    you are asking questions which have no bearing on anything and seem to indicate that you may have lost your mind ...

    Agreed

    @Dave_L said:

    @Wolfgang said:

    @Dave_L said:
    Do you think people should have the right to bear nuclear arms?

    you are asking questions which have no bearing on anything and seem to indicate that you may have lost your mind ...

    If you believe it is right to limit private ownership of nuclear arms, why not other arms designed to kill humans en masse?

    The 2nd Amendment covers weapons that would be used by an individual in battle, nuclear arms do not fall into that category. It's not the same thing.

  • Dave_LDave_L Posts: 2,328

    @davidtaylorjr said:

    @Dave_L said:

    @Wolfgang said:

    @Dave_L said:
    What should the Christian response be to the senseless killing of children in schools by those with guns protected by law?

    Sorry ... you got something terribly wrong there.
    The madman/terrorist/lunatic committing mass murder at a school is NOT protected by law ... he actually may be shot dead on the spot at any time in self-defense.

    Should we keep nuclear arms from public circulation? If so, why not move the line up slightly, and include guns designed specifically for killing the most amount of people in the least amount of time?

    This is just a nonsense comparison.

    @Wolfgang said:

    @Dave_L said:
    Do you think people should have the right to bear nuclear arms?

    you are asking questions which have no bearing on anything and seem to indicate that you may have lost your mind ...

    Agreed

    @Dave_L said:

    @Wolfgang said:

    @Dave_L said:
    Do you think people should have the right to bear nuclear arms?

    you are asking questions which have no bearing on anything and seem to indicate that you may have lost your mind ...

    If you believe it is right to limit private ownership of nuclear arms, why not other arms designed to kill humans en masse?

    The 2nd Amendment covers weapons that would be used by an individual in battle, nuclear arms do not fall into that category. It's not the same thing.

    Arms = arms. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

  • dct112685dct112685 Posts: 1,111

    @Dave_L said:

    @davidtaylorjr said:

    @Dave_L said:

    @Wolfgang said:

    @Dave_L said:
    What should the Christian response be to the senseless killing of children in schools by those with guns protected by law?

    Sorry ... you got something terribly wrong there.
    The madman/terrorist/lunatic committing mass murder at a school is NOT protected by law ... he actually may be shot dead on the spot at any time in self-defense.

    Should we keep nuclear arms from public circulation? If so, why not move the line up slightly, and include guns designed specifically for killing the most amount of people in the least amount of time?

    This is just a nonsense comparison.

    @Wolfgang said:

    @Dave_L said:
    Do you think people should have the right to bear nuclear arms?

    you are asking questions which have no bearing on anything and seem to indicate that you may have lost your mind ...

    Agreed

    @Dave_L said:

    @Wolfgang said:

    @Dave_L said:
    Do you think people should have the right to bear nuclear arms?

    you are asking questions which have no bearing on anything and seem to indicate that you may have lost your mind ...

    If you believe it is right to limit private ownership of nuclear arms, why not other arms designed to kill humans en masse?

    The 2nd Amendment covers weapons that would be used by an individual in battle, nuclear arms do not fall into that category. It's not the same thing.

    Arms = arms. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    You are hopeless. Do you understand what a militia is?

  • Dave_LDave_L Posts: 2,328

    @davidtaylorjr said:

    @Dave_L said:

    @davidtaylorjr said:

    @Dave_L said:

    @Wolfgang said:

    @Dave_L said:
    What should the Christian response be to the senseless killing of children in schools by those with guns protected by law?

    Sorry ... you got something terribly wrong there.
    The madman/terrorist/lunatic committing mass murder at a school is NOT protected by law ... he actually may be shot dead on the spot at any time in self-defense.

    Should we keep nuclear arms from public circulation? If so, why not move the line up slightly, and include guns designed specifically for killing the most amount of people in the least amount of time?

    This is just a nonsense comparison.

    @Wolfgang said:

    @Dave_L said:
    Do you think people should have the right to bear nuclear arms?

    you are asking questions which have no bearing on anything and seem to indicate that you may have lost your mind ...

    Agreed

    @Dave_L said:

    @Wolfgang said:

    @Dave_L said:
    Do you think people should have the right to bear nuclear arms?

    you are asking questions which have no bearing on anything and seem to indicate that you may have lost your mind ...

    If you believe it is right to limit private ownership of nuclear arms, why not other arms designed to kill humans en masse?

    The 2nd Amendment covers weapons that would be used by an individual in battle, nuclear arms do not fall into that category. It's not the same thing.

    Arms = arms. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    You are hopeless. Do you understand what a militia is?

    I understand what Arms are.... And the Christian's non-violent role in the world.

  • C_M_C_M_ Posts: 3,102

    Dave, two of your brethren don't agree with the overall premise of your question and position. I don't agree with HOW they stated their disagreements. CM

  • Dave_LDave_L Posts: 2,328

    @C_M_ said:
    Dave, two of your brethren don't agree with the overall premise of your question and position. I don't agree with HOW they stated their disagreements. CM

    Thanks for joining in. It is controlled disagreement between us that helps get to the bottom of the issues.

  • GaoLuGaoLu Posts: 1,367
    edited March 2018

    @Dave_L said:
    Thanks for joining in. It is controlled disagreement between us that helps get to the bottom of the issues.

    Controlled disagreement. Doing it Jesus' way, eh?

    When I was in high school and two boys wanted to fight, our coach would tell them they could fight, just show up in the gym, put on gloves and play by the rules and he would referee.

    Controlled, Jesus way.

    (That clearly isn't sarcasm, it is satire)

Sign In or Register to comment.