Comments
-
(Quote)
You know what Scripture says? Or you know what people have told you the Scripture means? The Scripture isn't very specific about what the 70 weeks are. And there is textual evidence in Daniel 9 to suggest there could be a gap.
-
(Quote)
I'll note you aren't actually interested in discussing truth and are closed-minded into your own understanding of Scripture whether it is correct or not. What are you scared of? Are you scared that your understanding of the Bible might…
-
(Quote)
Did you read the article or are you just going to insist on throwing out stupid statements?
-
(Quote)
Really not interested in discussing conspiracy theories.
But for the historical nature, Yes, states lead by SC left the union to form their own country because they believed the Federal Government overstepped its powers. Techni…
-
(Quote)
It was essentially about state's rights and what power the Federal Government should have over the States.
-
(Quote)
There is also no direct Scripture saying there isn't one. But the article actually gives textual evidence that there is so you should read it.
-
(Quote)
What I asked about the OP. What does it matter what we do on earth if we all get to Heaven?
-
(Quote)
Off topic
-
(Quote)
Here's a good article. https://www.bibleprophecyblog.com/2012/04/why-gap-in-daniels-70-weeks.html
-
(Quote)
That is true for SOME of the OT, not all of it. And even then, the NT is only needed to understand the OT fully.
-
(Quote)
You only read the passage that way if you already have a bent against the Jews.
-
(Quote)
That's how I am reading his posts...
-
Clearly, @Dave_L just wants to spout off hatred for a System that he thinks he understands and is not wanting to engage in actual discourse. in A verdict in search of evidence. Comment by reformed October 2018
-
(Quote)
Do explain how:
- The President who was duly elected and certified by the Electoral College is illegitimate because by definition of the Constitution, you are incorrect.
- How is the process illegitimate? The Constitu…
-
(Quote)
From the very start, starting with the example of Joseph, this article is off-base.
-
(Quote)
Thanks for the link but not that didn't really address my question.
-
(Quote)
I'm not sure that answered my question.
- Yes, the Bible must be interpreted against itself.
- Absolutely, there are no contradictions in Scripture.
- Yes, original audience understanding is the proper interpre…
-
Kavanaugh Ceremonial Swearing In is now complete. Great day for the country.
-
(Quote)
For clarification this does mean literal when literal makes sense correct?
-
(Quote)
I agree with this.
-
(Quote)
You don't need to read past the first few paragraphs to see the bias in the story. It is skewed facts, tainted perception.
-
(Quote)
Um, that makes no sense. I am saying you aren't accurately describing dispensationalism. That has nothing to do with Scriptural support denying what you have said.
-
(Quote)
Then you sorely misunderstood or the people teaching it to you (and I'm guessing you did not attend Moody or DTS so you can't really claim that) didn't understand and/or teach it correctly.
I spent considerable time with Dr. Ry…
-
(Quote)
You were. I don't know what it was, but it wasn't mainstream Dispensationalism.
-
(Quote)
I don't think you can say you recovered from Dispensational teaching, you were taught something else.
-
(Quote)
Yet where two or more are gathered in His name He is there. That can be a building. Do you honestly think God was only in the temple? God is everywhere. Your interpretation is falling apart.
-
(Quote)
That doesn't say He replaces THE temple. Scripture also says our bodies are a temple. Seems to me something is wrong with your interpretation here.
-
Here we go....
-
(Quote)
Wow, really cute, same kind of arguments KJV onlyers say about the Non Inspired Version.
Makes for a good punchline but not a sound argument.
That being said, you have actually demonstrated that you don't know much abou…
-
(Quote)
Jesus is the Temple?
