Comments
-
(Quote)
No
-
(Quote)
I have posted twice now. Good grief.
-
(Quote)
Except I have you just refuse to read it.
-
(Quote)
Here we go around the merry-go-round again. By that argument you also can't believe in the Trinity.
-
(Quote)
Yes really. I've said that a thousand times now.
-
(Quote)
I have, you refuse to read them. They are in the articles.
-
(Quote)
Ok, except we are giving direct Scriptures so you can't use that argument.
-
(Quote)
What in the world are you talking about? What is a 20 diatribe?
-
(Quote)
We have given direct quotes from Scripture. You refuse to read them. So if you aren't interested in actually discussing this then why did you start the topic?
-
(Quote)
It was a Red Herring argument. Testimony is the same weight and value in ANY crime in the criminal justice system.
-
(Quote)
Agreed
-
(Quote)
He's always trying to twist it, you can take that to the bank.
-
(Quote)
Which is why you should actually read the articles. You aren't really interested in truth. You are only interested in Dave's brand of theology and plug your ears when anyone challenges it.
-
(Quote)
You can't reason with a liberal who likes to revise history.
-
(Quote)
Well if you liberals didn't come up with lunatic fantastical talking points, we wouldn't need to call them such now would we? I'm sorry if you don't like the fact that I call a spade a spade.
-
(Quote)
Because you take his speech out of the context of the whole proceeding as I showed in my original post on the topic.
-
(Quote)
Revisionist history. A liberal specialty.
-
(Quote)
God defines God. You can find it in the Bible.
-
(Quote)
Trust me, I know my history. I don't partake in liberal history revisionism.
-
(Quote)
How can a law be binding before it is given?
-
(Quote)
I haven't seen any yet.
-
(Quote)
See my original post that you said had some solid arguments. The Electoral College was suggested before slavery was even discussed.
-
There is a simple answer, WE ABSOLUTELY DO NOT WORSHIP THE SAME GOD.
-
(Quote)
The articles give scripture and an explanation of that scripture. You have no argument that is legitimate to not read them. Furthermore, you can't say "Scripture is the only credible source in this matter" because you are using an inte…
-
(Quote)
There is not a shred of it. Just liberal nonsense. There is as much evidence that Trump is a racist that there is for Dr. Ford's story being remotely true...oh wait...
-
(Quote)
The timeline doesn't fit your analysis.
-
(Quote)
Not true. We already submitted the evidence but you refuse to even look at it. So stop lying.
-
(Quote)
How would you know if there is direct scriptural support or not? You haven't even read it. So no false prophets, just one person speaking falsehoods about others. You.
-
(Quote)
You won't read our explanations so why should we bother?
-
(Quote)
Let's start with the fact that he quoted a resource that said it was a dream. NOWHERE is that found within the text.
