Comments
-
(Quote)
Who said I want to make them available to those people?
-
(Quote)
Yes I meant method. And do show how you use the scientific method for evolution. It is impossible.
You cannot test or recreate evolution.
-
(Quote)
No I am saying they don't think he does not exist, they just reject him outright and say he doesn't because he doesn't fit their belief system.
-
(Quote)
You actually cannot employ the scientific theory for evolution.
-
(Quote)
Once again you are changing the argument. We are not saying they believe in God as He is, but that they by nature must and do believe there is a God. Nobody believes there is not a God, not really.
-
(Quote)
No, we are talking about there is no true atheist. And nobody has said anything about loathing anyone.
-
(Quote)
God wrote the Bible. I think he knew better than anyone. There is zero evidence that the Genesis account is not a literal history.
-
(Quote)
Much "science" though is NOT based on observation of creation. Evolution (macro) is a prime example. It is based on wanting to write God out of the story.
-
(Quote)
No, that statement is what is absurd. Why can God create Adam with age, but not everything else? That makes no sense.
-
(Quote)
You are confusing two different things. We are not talking about believing and following God for salvation, we are talking about belief in the existence of a god at all (which has been revealed to all men and is known by all) which do…
-
(Quote)
We are not discussing salvation Dave. That is a completely different topic.
-
(Quote)
We are not talking about faith, we are talking about existence and belief of that existence. Why are you defending people when the Bible says they are indefensible?
-
@Bill_Coley you and @Jan still have not addressed the Adam factor. I…
-
(Quote)
But you do not necessarily observe origination of all celestial bodies, only those that were not part of original creation.
-
(Quote)
You are still making assumptions though that the light was NOT created to be that way
-
No I didn't actually. I'm saying you made a case in a totally different scenario. No reason to ban any of those things.
-
(Quote)
Satan believes and knows there is a God.
That being said Romans 1:21 clearly states they know there is a God but they reject God.
-
There is nothing to say there isn't but certainly no reason to believe there is.
-
(Quote)
This is a great point. We can't observe the past because it already happened. So we make assumptions based on what we see today. However, we have an EYEWITNESS account of what happened in God's word.
-
(Quote)
We don't know the literal meaning of the first usage of the word. We do know the meaning of yom. That is the difference. 13 billion years just doesn't make sense nor does it line up with Scripture.
-
(Quote)
Doubt that they are adequately refuted.
-
(Quote)
Romans says everyone knows God exists so yes, they are dishonest. Even if it means they are being dishonest with themselves they are dishonest. That's not judging, that's biblical.
-
(Quote)
I disagree. I don't think they are courageous or honest. They are foolish, don't confuse that with courage. They are not honest, the Bible tells us that nobody truly believes there is no God. They just reject God. Big difference.
(Quote)Actually there is evidence that suggests otherwise. Feel free to visit ICR. There is just as much evidence that the universie is 13 billion years old as there is that we came from primordial ooze. ZERO. Also zero evidence of common …
(Quote)I still say that it is using that as an example and not an interpretation. I have read quite a few commentaries on that verse since we have started this discussion and I have yet to find one that puts forth your view on this matter.
(Quote)Have you ever heard of wood tar? Tar does not only come from fossil remains.
(Quote)He is an Archangel.
(Quote)Yes and you tend to twist them.
(Quote)Your examples are common place liberal talking points. So we are at an impasse. You live in a fantasy world of political correctness where liberals do nothing wrong.
Benghazi did not find that there was no coverup, quite the op…
