Comments
-
(Quote)
I've not spread mis-information. I reported facts.
That being said, this whole thing is highly suspect. Why would she not be jumping at the opportunity (like she said she would) to testify? All of a sudden she is going to be u…
-
(Quote)
Still wouldn't change my opinion of guns. It's a terrible thing that happened. But that doesn't mean you should take away guns.
-
(Quote)
Just being honest
-
(Quote)
Because I don't think the current or future membership is capable.
-
(Quote)
UPDATE: Lawyers for the accuser have come up with a lame excuse that their client thought that Kavanaugh and her would be at the same table which was never the case. This is getting dumber by the moment and anyone can see right through…
-
(Quote)
Because you would have to lockk a post everytime one is created and I doubt Jan wants to take the time to do it.
-
Not possible.
-
(Quote)
In other words, you know I'm right.
-
(Quote)
It doesn't take scholarship to quote you and call you out when you say you said something in the quote that you in fact did not.
-
(Quote)
First of all, the Trump ADMINISTRATION has nothing to do with it. Congress (particularly the Senate) does. Second, Senator Grassley has already scheduled a hearing for next week. Kavanaugh has agreed. However, the accuser will not re…
-
(Quote)
Not in the post I quoted you didn't.
-
(Quote)
It ain't coming from you, that's for sure.
-
(Quote)
Right, because half of the Obama Administration wasn't under investigation (or is currently under investigation).
-
(Quote)
They are not in cages. Good grief.
-
(Quote)
Innocent until proven guilty. Statute of limitations have passed. It is he said/she said. He has passed through FBI checks numerous times. The Democrats sat on this. Her story does not match the notes from 2012 with her therapist. She …
-
(Quote)
If it is so, provide evidence.
-
(Quote)
You are the one making claim, burden of proof is on you.
-
(Quote)
Actually I think it is you who needs to check your history...
-
(Quote)
That's why we have the legislature. Founders thought your way was a bad idea.
-
(Quote)
Of course it is possible, though I don't see how that is relevant.
-
(Quote)
Because do you think the will of California and New York represents the will of the whole country? No, it doesn't.
-
(Quote)
Yes, I can name one. The United States Senate.
-
(Quote)
Ruling. What seems wrong with the system? Do you think California and New York should decide who gets to be President? Or do you think that the little states should get a fair shot as well?
-
(Quote)
When I am attacked (whether directly or passively) I am not going to just move on. You are lying.
-
If @Bill_Coley doesn't think it was an attack that's ridiculous.
-
(Quote)
Because it is QUITE a coincidence that this gets posted just hours after I issue a private apology on something you were clearly up-in-arms about. You are the one causing trouble.
-
(Quote)
Eyewitnesses say it never happened, no proof. So I guess I don't "know" it didn't happen, but if you aren't going to be a hypocrite then you should also attack in Brett Michael Kavanaugh and the Roman Catholic Church Comment by reformed September 2018
-
Behavior that is nowhere near reality or proven. This never happened.
-
- Self-explanatory
- To keep a few cities (or larger states) from reigning the country.
- Yes for the reason listed above, it protects the small areas of the country.
- What in the world does this have to do with anything?…
-
(Quote)
Actually none of this is true.
