Comments
-
(Quote)
Even still. Feinstein needed to submit the letter to the committee as protocol. She withheld information and her office leaked it at the last hour.
-
(Quote)
Ad Hominem @Bill_Coley correct? Are you going to call this one out?
That being said, I watched the hearings, I have kept close tabs on …
-
(Quote)
-
(Quote)
Apparently, Bill Coley is allowed to call out double standards but nobody else is. I'll make a note.
-
(Quote)
Ah now who is beating the messenger not the message? Oh yeah, @Bill_Coley That being said, I clarified my statement to show your double standar…
-
(Quote)
Sure it is.
Clearly you are one of the people who do not want the truth about this to come out. IF it isn't the JC's business or the Senate's business who does have it has their business?
I mean really. And if the lett…
-
(Quote)
No, so far that is what you have done. Given us nothing but idiotic ideas of what is reality in this situation and ignoring the innocent until proven guilty rule of law.
-
(Quote)
That's not beating the messenger Bill. That is fact. You have a double standard. You support a candidate that is caught in multiple lies, proven, but you are flat against a SCOTUS nominee that may or may not be caught in a lie.
(Quote)It's not getting an FBI investigation. Good grief. It's getting a Senate investigation.
That being said, how is it a waste of resources? It was a private letter to the Committee. It was Feinstein's responsibility to share it wi…
(Quote)Thanks
(Quote)You may want to consider factors other than alcohol in why Kavanaugh was upset. You would be too.
(Quote)What is Granville Sharp's rule?
(Quote)That's not laughable. Congress is not concerned with who abused Ford because it's not their concern or job. That's the criminal justice system.
And here is the violation. It's a violation of Ford's confidentiality. Apparently, …
(Quote)Clearly you don't know how things work.
If anything, her major fault was that she did not go harder after Ford.
(Quote)So does heading a soccer ball. Should people who play soccer be allowed to go out for the Supreme Court? That's just an idiotic suggestion that because some brain cells died or were damaged that they can't be on the Supreme Court. I gu…
(Quote)Nobody is in a cage. Stop lying.
(Quote)You were a Clinton supporter which shows you don't actually value truth telling.
(Quote)I think the fact that you are worried about a yearbook is pretty ridiculous.
(Quote)Except there is nothing in the article that actually says he knew before. It doesn't give a date of the messages. There were quite a few days between the New Yorker story and the messages.
So until you have something a little m…
(Quote)I misspoke.
Nothing in this article except speculation Bill.
(Quote)Really the parents should all be charged with child abuse for forcing their kids to go through this ordeal.
(Quote)So how do they know it is a new directive? More anonymous sources?
(Quote)Yep. Shame on their parents for involving them in criminal activity.
(Quote)I didn't link to Politico. And the article on The Hill that I did link to does say that a directive was issued on Friday. I never disputed that. What I am saying is that the directive was never released. So you assume the one that was …
(Quote)If this is going to become standard practice it needs to be done equally. The person crying foul routinely does the same thing in a passive-aggressive manner.
(Quote)No the criminal parents who did this to their children are.
(Quote)Citation? If it is proof, why did you not provide a link to prove your claim?
(Quote)What I am saying is I don't think there is a new directive since we never saw the original directive and your sources for said original directive are Anonymous. (convenient).
I think this is all more political sham and fake new…
(Quote)Oh you mean the anonymous sources. hahhahaha Sorry Bill. The NYT doesn't keep getting a pass on anonymous sources.
