Comments
-
Bump
-
(Quote)
Are you saying that is the only spiritual truth in the OT?
-
(Quote)
Again, if you are going to attack a position, you best know what you are attacking first. Clearly you do not.
-
(Quote)
Do you believe it is possible for a non-believer to fully understand the Bible? I don't. I think there are things that we can only truly understand with the guidance of the Spirit.
-
Dave, if you are going to attack a mainstream belief you should at least portray it accurately. Jesus is the Anti-Christ? Really?
-
(Quote)
It is not impossible to uncover the spiritual truth in the OT apart from the NT. That is extreme hyperbole and nowhere near accurate.
-
(Quote)
I agree with this statement.
-
(Quote)
Actually you have gone down a rabbit trail that is RELATED to the topic, but not on topic. Specifically you want to talk about the end times interpretations and how they relate to the Kingdom of God and whether it is physical or spiri…
-
(Quote)
Dave start a new topic.
-
(Quote)
Good catch, yes that is what I intended to say. Thanks.
-
(Quote)
We don't know that she was a victim first of all. If something did happen to her it is unlikely it was Kavanaugh.
-
(Quote)
That is simply not true. If you want to start a different thread feel free to, but don't derail this thread as @C_M_ has a good topic going here.
-
(Quote)
I didn't say that Dave.
-
(Quote)
Then it really is pointless because he is now a Justice. Move on.
-
(Quote)
Agreed mostly, though #3 can be troublesome. Who determines what the right presuppositions are?
-
(Quote)
What does it matter if her accusation pre-dates the nomination? I mean really? And the only person who said she said Kavanaugh is her husband. How do we know he is telling the truth? Why didn't he say something to authorities? It's ju…
-
(Quote)
Dave seems to think, from what I have read on these forums, that the NT overrides or corrects the NT. That isn't the case. They harmonize. I also don't think there is any evidence that the OT writers didn't know what they were talking…
-
(Quote)
It is perfectly within the realm of possibility Bill. That being said, it was still 30+ years after the fact. She can't remember key details. There is no evidence, no witnesses that will corroborate the story. Face it, it did not happ…
-
(Quote)
Even still her husband's statement is good for nothing but hearsay. And I noticed you can't actually refute the theory that she might be mentally ill and none of this is real.
-
(Quote)
That's not a safe hermeneutical approach at all, nor is it accurate.
-
(Quote)
No. I don't acknowledge that. All we know is she said a federal judge. She never identified him.
That being said, for all we know this is some fantasy of a mentally ill person. We don't know that she is telling what actually h…
-
(Quote)
I got that part of the reference, I am having a hard time understanding the rest of it.
-
(Quote)
Woop de do. So 30 years after an event she claims that something happened with no corroboration and no witnesses that will back her up even though she says some were there. She still can't keep her story straight and still can't reme…
-
(Quote)
???
-
(Quote)
Funny... Are you a sore loser?
-
I have noticed the liberals have been silent here since the announcement...
-
As they say "Truth will out"
-
Manchin is also voting yes. WE HAVE THE VOTES. Justice prevails.
-
Good question:
5:34–37 Christ referred to the old covenant commands to keep one’s oaths (Lev. 19:12; Num. 30:2; Deut. 23:21–23). He condemned the practice of swearing oaths lightly by avoiding direct reference to God (23:16–22) and commen…
-
(Quote)
This is a disgraceful interpretation of what has happend.
- I am glad that there are people working to end sexual violence.
- You totally detract from that by covertly proclaiming Kavanaugh's guilt without any evidenc…
