Comments
-
(Quote)
Now the President is a racist? Let me mail you a tin foil hat.
-
There are so many problems with the post above from CM I don't even know where to begin...
-
(Quote)
I have, another time when you mentioned this, and it is just flat wrong. https://www.lawliberty.org/2017/01/03/no-the-electo…
-
(Quote)
Exactly
-
(Quote)
Probably did not know he was making a false statement.
-
(Quote)
I agree he was not proven innocent. That was probably just a misstep for the President, though not as serious as you try to make it out to be.
-
(Quote)
Except they can, and do. I sent you an article on it that you refuse to read. That's dishonest Dave.
And I'm going to challenge you on Dispensationalism not being found in the Early Church.
in A verdict in search of evidence. Comment by reformed October 2018
-
(Quote)
And you go back to that argument. Which, of course, I have already countered that you can't find a single verse that says all three of those are the same. You have to piece it together from various parts of Scripture. The same is with…
-
(Quote)
So in other words you used that as a distraction as opposed to attacking the fact that I showed your double standard. Is this because you couldn't combat my charge of the double standard and therefore your argument against my theology …
-
(Quote)
So far the only thing you and I disagree on (theologically) in this particular thread is Daniel's 70 weeks. So are you referring to that or something else?
-
(Quote)
What do you mean all of the above?
-
(Quote)
Such as?
-
(Quote)
What makes you say that?
-
(Quote)
It is exactly the same because the verses don't say those are three in one directly. It's a double standard Dave. There are things you believe that are not explicitly written in Scripture. By your own standard, you should throw those …
-
(Quote)
Exactly, yet you believe it. So why must the specific gap be explicitly stated with regard to the 70 weeks? That's a double standard.
-
(Quote)
You don't have direct quotes for the Trinity either so you can't argue that.
-
(Quote)
Um, you have a few facts out of whack. That is not the reason we have the Electoral College.
-
(Quote)
I'll tell you what, you read that article and comment on it, then I will happily give you direct references for those things, although I'm not sure we dispensationalists believe in a restored Roman Empire the way you are talking about …
-
(Quote)
That's not the point Dave. The point is you don't have an argument and refuse to look at evidence given to you because you think it is a waste of time.
-
(Quote)
What direct quotes do you have for the Trinity? See how this works Dave?
-
(Quote)
So now I am curious, what about when Jesus talked about the rich man and Lazarus?
-
(Quote)
I did, in the article that you refuse to read.
-
(Quote)
I can also say Scripture directly supports a gap in the 69th and 70th week. So where do we go from here? You don't have a verse that directly says there is a Trinity and I don't have a verse that directly says there is a gap.
(Quote)And there are people who claim it says otherwise. The point is, it does not DIRECTLY say there is a Trinity does it? So you can't say that because there is not a verse that directly says there is a gap that it doesn't exist.
(Quote)And I provided an article to show evidence of that. You have not provided any evidence to the contrary other than evidence from silence which is not evidence at all.
By your logic, the Trinity also doesn't exist because no ver…
(Quote)We aren't asking you to return to whatever crazy things you were taught that call themselves Dispensationalism but were nothing of the sort of mainstream dispensationalism.
(Quote)Exactly but @Dave_L doesn't want to hear that. He knows what it says with 100% certainty.
(Quote)Thanks Bill
(Quote)Yeah it really doesn't make any sense.
(Quote)So why do some Universalists then try to force a moral code onto others and condemn certain acts? It seems to me that they do not believe their own view of Scripture if that is the case. If everyone goes to Heaven, then just let everyo…
