Comments
-
(Quote)
Oh brother Dave, is that the best you have? You know we do not have every time Peter did a baptism recorded right? Or the other disciples for that matter right? You really need to come up with a better argument than that.
I gav…
-
(Quote)
Take a look at what I just posted to @Wolfgang
Ignatius used the model Jesus did and that was less than 100 years after Christ's death. H…
-
(Quote)
This is false of course. Ignatius had the quote in his epistle to Philadelphia:
, “Until He come for whom it is reserved, and He shall be the expectation p 85 of the Gentiles,”1 have been fulfilled in the Gospel, [our Lord s…
-
(Quote)
I quoted Jesus. It's not the Catholic model. It was the model Christ laid out in Matthew's Gospel. But I have already shown you that they are both the same thing.
-
Bill I'm intrigued, do you have the original link as opposed to just the document link so I can check sources etc?
-
(Quote)
How can you call it the catholic model when it is a direct quote from Scripture?
-
(Quote)
The singular “name” followed by the threefold reference to “Father, Son, and Holy Spirit” suggests both unity and plurality in the Godhead. Here is the clearest Trinitarian “formula” anywhere in the Gospels, and it is therefore often a…
-
(Quote)
Um, you did in your original post.
-
(Quote)
Hardly, I showed you what it means to do something in the name of something. I OFTEN show you biblically how I support my positions. You either come up with excuses that a certain portion of Scripture is worthless or you take something…
-
(Quote)
Except I already have.
-
(Quote)
No
-
(Quote)
Both are right.
-
(Quote)
sigh
-
(Quote)
It's the same thing Dave.
-
(Quote)
That doesn't mean everything you do you must say the name of Jesus Christ specifically. That's not what that say at all. If it did it would contradict Jesus' own words. What that is saying you are doing something in the authority of th…
-
(Quote)
How is that relevant?
-
(Quote)
I'm very focused on the topic. Perhaps when you come to reality we can have a rational discussion. This is not guns through the eyes of a child, this therad is guns through the hyperbolic eyes of in Guns, Guns, Guns -- Through The Eyes Of A Child Comment by dct112685 April 2018
-
(Quote)
Troll
-
(Quote)
I'm not sure I understand the question.
-
(Quote)
It's a public forum, if you didn't want a response from anyone but GaoLu, use a private message.
I also noticed you didn't respond to my charge. Guess I was spot on in my analysis.
-
(Quote)
Stupid stupid that's what this is not a shred of truth so mind your own biz
Stupid Stupid do you even know what's real? I guess not and you just can't deal. -
(Quote)
Yes I have read all about your hyperbolic scenarios that aren't based in a shred of reality.
-
(Quote)
Wouldn't it be easier to just move to a different country? What is your big issue with guns in the classroom anyway? Something that is actually based in reality I mean....
-
(Quote)
First, it wasn't written to unbelievers. It was written to Israel, the only believers at the time.
Second, the civil law and moral laws criss-cross at some parts. The only laws we fully disregard are the ceremonial laws.
-
(Quote)
Why?
-
(Quote)
Jesus didn't teach on this. Exodus says you will not be held responsible.
-
(Quote)
No
-
(Quote)
Turn the other cheek is not about self-defense. Good grief, round the merry go round we go again. You sir, are a Pharisee.
-
(Quote)
Ok.... I do select those who have policies I agree with, yes.
