Comments
-
(Quote)
As usual, you mix unrelated things together to create "Dave's Theology"
-
(Quote)
First, who are you referring to lying to the FBI. I am assuming you are talking about Michael Flynn?
-
(Quote)
That is your opinion based on poor theology and Scripture taken out of context.
-
(Quote)
If you don't realize it you don't realize it. Doesn't matter the circumstance.
-
(Quote)
There is no Scripture to support this view.
-
(Quote)
Notice a key point in this: "If it is possible"
It does not say you cannot defend yourself. It says do not take revenge. Those are not the same things.
-
(Quote)
Reference?
And no, the NT does not forbid self-defense. It speaks against retaliation, not self-defense.
-
(Quote)
That's fine if that is your conviction. But the NT did not replace the OT. So do not push your views on everyone else.
-
(Quote)
It's nothing. The guilty pleas have nothing to do with the Democrat's overall narrative. They are low hanging fruit and don't mean a thing.
I'm sure you probably break the law every day without realizing it. I'm sure we all do.…
-
(Quote)
That's called cherry picking Scripture to support a view. That's not a good thing. With that method you can justify homosexuality, adultery, etc. You can justify anything if you don't look at the whole.
-
(Quote)
Name one good point he brought up?
-
(Quote)
Scripture allows for violence in self-defense. The book of Exodus, as well as other parts of the Torah, make this clear.
There is nothing to say that defense is against God's law. Sure you will say the sermon on the mount and y…
-
(Quote)
Yet God clearly recognized people groups in Scripture. The Jews were the chosen people. Hmm.... Does that make God a racist?
-
(Quote)
When the messenger creates the message he is fair game. It's not reality. I need a doctor because I support arming teachers? No sir, I'm not the crazy one.
-
(Quote)
So you really aren't interested in the truth then. You wish to think the ECF were racist and don't wish to engage the truth?
-
@C_M_ are you going to acknowledge my response?
-
@C_M_ I noticed you ignored my response to you.
-
(Quote)
Except you aren't having a discussion, you are bringing up a point of nonsense to try and score points, but it has no bearing or merit on anything.
-
(Quote)
Bill, I'm not going to continue this stupid game for your political rhetoric based in nonsense.
-
(Quote)
Defense.
-
(Quote)
That's cute but I don't rely upon arms and never had. but that doesn't mean we shouldn't keep and bear arms either.
-
(Quote)
No, it is not that simple. There are thousands of gun owners who do not use these weapons for evil. It is the RARE occurance that these weapons are used for evil in this country.. RARE. As in, it hardly ever happens.
-
(Quote)
No, my point was many gun crimes are committed by Americans who are NOT firearm eligible and either obtained the weapon illegally, or fell through the cracks of the system. So no, your assertion is not fair or proper.
-
(Quote)
No that isn't what it shows at all. You have this ridiculous idea that gun owners who support the 2nd Amendment and its intent, intend to kill in mass numbers. That is not the case at all. If you want to be taken seriously you and
(Quote)That's a very vague definition. And what does hunting have to do with the conversation? Nothing.
(Quote)Ok, this isn't even a coherent post. What in the world are you saying?
(Quote)Where is your source for that definition?
(Quote)Thank you for the clarification, though I disagree still with the premise, however, I guess technically you could say that yes. But a good majority of gun crimes do not come from legally obtained guns, or people who should have been al…
(Quote)Can you tell me what an assault weapon is?
(Quote)There are many steps that could have been taken in the most recent killings that would have prevented without gun control.
However, I do support:
- More extensive background checks.
- Gun safety classes being …
