Comments
-
(Quote)
Your historical events are correct, but what they mean and how it impacts immigration policy is off.
-
(Quote)
Yeah his version of the history of US Immigration policy is definitely interesting...
-
(Quote)
My position is they are unrelated. And the statute still has nothing to do with immigration in reality. People see it as that, they associate it with it, but it actually has nothing to do with it.
-
(Quote)
Mechizedek, oh we should start a whole thread as to the identity of Melchizedek
-
(Quote)
Which is something totally different Bill. The point is you, and other liberals, try to use that poem as a litmus test for immigration policy and have no business doing so. I believe Jim Acosta, wonderful journalist (note sarcasm) did…
-
(Quote)
The Lazarus poem has NEVER been anything related to US Policy, Law, or any such thing. That is something liberals often point to in order to squelch immigration policy that actually makes sense. Not to mention, the statute of liberty i…
-
(Quote)
Minor details....
-
Protestant Canon
-
(Quote)
Then there is no real death for anyone. No human fully dies, their soul continues.
-
(Quote)
The Bible does know something about God having a human body. John chapter 1, the Word became flesh.
-
(Quote)
You should look up the definition of racism. prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.
I don't see evidence of that at all. Heck,…
-
(Quote)
In case you haven't noticed, the Statute of Libert has nothing to do with United States Immigration policy.
-
@Jan Is that also why it stated my thread had to be approved (which still hasn't happened) before it shows up on the forum?
-
(Quote)
I have friends who say things like Trump, just different word choice. But like I said that is ****not**** racist no matter how you twist it. That's just stupid to say so.
-
(Quote)
Sorry, The thing the Dossier said about the president. It's all fake.
-
(Quote)
No Bill, we agree on the moral judgment. I'm just saying it wasn't a comment that was supposed to be made public and the people who did so should be ashamed. I heard the former governor of NC today on the radio, who knows Trump as well…
-
(Quote)
I guess that's a hard one for me as I see Bible Questions more as like lay questions and Biblical Studies more academic.
I dunno, maybe I'm just a theology major snob lol.
-
(Quote)
Yes @Jan Biblical Studies would be a great fit.
-
(Quote)
You aren't making any sense.
-
(Quote)
Yes Dave, that is also what I am saying too. But that doesn't change the fact He had a physical body which you have said does not happen after glorification. So are you retracting that statement?
-
(Quote)
Christ had a physical body after His resurrection, Scripture says we are also going to have glorified bodies like Christ, therefore we have a physical body, just like Christ.
-
(Quote)
Once again Dave you are saying nothing new here nor explaining how there is not a physical glorified body just like Christ had/has.
-
(Quote)
The comment was behind closed doors and not meant for public consumption. That's the first problem. Second, while the word choice is bad, I agree with the premise. No that isn't racist. It's called taking care of the homeland first.…
-
(Quote)
YES, it says they will have physical bodies Dave. But you have stated repeaedly they will not.
-
(Quote)
That doesn't even make sense Dave. First, Christendom does not represent all nations and to say that is astounding.
Yes the gospel is the antidote, but that doesn't have anything to do with Satan being bound up. The gospel has …
-
(Quote)
You focus on the church in Jerusalem and Israel, but the NT church was not confined to those areas. I don't see evidence for your claims.
-
(Quote)
The left doesn't care about reality or facts.
-
(Quote)
Dave you keep spitting out the same things and contradicting yourself, unless you have something new I'm done with this conversation.
-
(Quote)
I've never put it within apologetics, that doesn't mean it shouldn't be there though.