Comments
-
(Quote)
Not quite. God, for the Trinitarian, is always tri-personal even if as in this case the Father is the referent. In other words, this reference to the Father does not do away with the second and third persons of the Trinity – Son and …
-
(Quote)
In Scripture where the term God is used of the one true God this would refer to the Father for both Unitarian and Trinitarian.
Observations:
The Unitarian foundation of God is: One Bein… -
(Quote)
No.
This type of argumentation is most used in the attempt to demonstrate that all religions and views of God are equally valid and true. It is based on the assumption of relativism and subjectivism whereby each individual is th… -
Just a quick comment to clarify.
Appealing was in reference to your choices made in quoting the verse – the additional
@GaoLu
Thank you for your kind words.(Quote)Agree. Solid advice.
(Quote)Absolutely agreed !!!!!
This, somewhat older, post is from page 22 of this discussion.
My apologies, as there is no reason I would purposely and repeatedly post.
Is there anyway to delete these 4 unnecessary pos…
(Quote)Clarification of this line:
...which Metzger disagreed with based on what he considered a greater manuscript attestation to Ἰησοῦς.
I ought to have written the following:
...which Metzger disagreed with, based o…
(Quote)I agree.
However, I believe, as illustrated by the above statement, there is some confusion of the Trinity Doctrine regarding the distinction between the Father, Son, Spirit.
The doctrine is explicit in that there are t…
(Quote)*TSKS: article - substantive - kai - substantive
(Quote)(Quote)I agree that Ἰησοῦς is the more difficult reading over Κύριος; however, there are five variant readings of which two read Ἰησοῦς, and a third reads θεος Χριστος. (cf. Philip W. Comfort, New Testament Text and Translation Commentary, Ju…
(Quote)Some Observations Regarding John 1:1-3
First: in the context of these verses ἐν ἀρχῇ, vs. 1-2, would allude to that which is timeless eternity; differing from the tempora…
