Comments
-
(Quote)
Thank you!
-
Dave, could you please list the titles of (or quote) at three resources (Commentaries/Articles) that specifically comment on Romans 11:28 and illustrate clearly for a layman the interpretation that you hold to concerning Romans 1…
-
(Quote)
Dave, please could you list (or quote) at three resources that specifically address Romans 11:28 with the interpretation that you hold to.
-
(Quote)
THANK YOU Wolfgang!
-
Dave, that still does not answer my question which requested articles, commentaries, exegesis, specifically on your purposed interpretation of Romans 11:28.
-
(Quote)
The Bible I believe is clear that there is only one God (1 Kings 8:60, Ephesians 4:5-6 ), one way to God (John 14:6).
The Bible is also clear that God chose the time and places were people would live (Acts 17:26) and that peopl…
-
I am still interested in seeing articles and or commentary that offers exegesis or some clearer explanation of the theology you suggest concerning Romans 11:28.
-
I have already searched and studied this issue on Circumcision in depth, but I have not found reference to the theology/point of view that you hold on Romans 11:28.
-
You apparently did not read my request or you were perhaps responding to someone else's request??? After all, I did not request 'proof-texting' but rather for exegesis, articles, and commentaries from your logos library that might clear up the m…
-
I would like to make clear that I do not advocate western Christians using Allah to refer to God in English speaking contexts nor in a number of eastern contexts.
-
(Quote)
The way he answered lead me to believe he did not actually read what I wrote.
-
(Quote)
In other words, you believe that the new covenant replaced the "circumcision of the heart" mentioned in first in Deuteronomy 10:16, Deuteronomy 30:6, and referred to in Romans 2:29?
-
Dave, what resources in your Logos library or in paper library ofter clear exegesis to illustrate the points of view that you suggest?
As for true circumcision(see: Deuteronomy 10:16, 30:6) it never faded and neither did Israel For, Roman…
-
(Quote)
I think the above is a great point because it is very similar to what happened in the OT. In the Hebrew Bible and in ancient near eastern literature El and Elohim can be used for both the pagan deities and the Elohim of Israel.
-
Well, then I would be interested in seeing quotes from your recommended articles or commentaries in your Logos library (or paper library) that explain Romans 11:28.
-
(Quote)
I think the text (Romans 11:28) means what it says in the context Romans chapter 11. And, earlier on this thread, I have also already quoted a number of resources that offer an explanation of this passage.
See the follow:
Do, you mean to say then that you believe that Jesus and the Church are "With respect to the gospel, they are enemies for your sake, but with respect to election, they are dearly loved for the sake of the fathers." (Romans 11:28 LEB) ?
(Quote)I believe that there is only one Israel and only one true Messiah. And, I also believe that there is only one Church.
Which is precisely why "the enemies of the gospel" (Romans 11:28) logically is not speaking about Christ or t…
(Quote)If Jesus and Christendom are "enemies of the Gospel" for "your sake"(i.e. the sake of the Church) then perhaps, but not only would that line of reasoning be a contradiction it would not fit the context…
In regards to Roman 11:28:
With respect to the gospel, they are enemies for your sake, but with respect to election, they are dearly loved for the sake of the fathers. For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable. (LEB Romans…Here are but a few snippets from the internet that may or may not be relevant to the topic at hand:
Michael Abd ABD El-Massih director of the Arabic Bible Outreach Ministry.
(Quote)in Do Christians and Muslims worship the same God? Comment by Mitchell October 2018
(Quote)Thank you for bringing this to my attention!!
(Quote)First thanks for posing an astute and thought provocating question
Based on the assumption that
(1) God knows everything (Psalm 147:5, Psalm 139:1-4, Isaiah 40:28, Isaiah 46:9-10, 1 Kings 8:39)
(2) and the Assumpti…(Quote)To provide for a little context please notice 2nd page of this thread where I briefly answered the OP's questions that started this thread if you have not done so already.
Now, are the answers given those of a Dispensationalist?<…> @C_M_ said:
> Mitchell,
> I am not inclined to agree with you and Mr. Reformed on your points above.
what exactly are my ‘poi…(Quote)Very well said and I think that could be extended to apply to a whole lot more than end time theology. In my opinion, way too much division in the Church has been caused because of different beliefs regarding the nonessentials of faith…
> @Dave_L said:
> Does scripture directly support any of today’s most popular doctrines?
What, are today's most popular doctrines?
…> @Dave_L said:
> But, the concept of one God with three distinct centers of will called Father, Son, and Holy Spirit is.
Then concept …(Quote)Precisely! Neither the Latin term Trinity nor the term Personae appears in the Masoretic Text nor the Greek text NT. It is for that reason one must turn elsewhere to find the definitions and history of those terms.
According to Wikipedia's article on Trinity:
(Quote)
