Comments
-
(Quote)
The issue is NOT whether you think the eight witnesses identified in Dr Ford's attorneys' letter "count." The issue is the veracity of your claim that Sen Feinstein "blatantly and patently" lied in her comments.
That's why I as…
-
(Quote)
You asked whether I would give Justice Kavanaugh the respect he deserves. I answered your question directly. Now you ask a new question. My response is the same because it accounts for the degree to which Kavanaugh has been/will be "cl…
-
(Quote)
Your liberal lies hypothesis is predicated on at least one necessary premise. Let's test it:
Please provide links to quotations from Dr Ford or her attorneys - whether in newspaper articles, other documents, or media interviews…
-
(Quote)
You can count on me to give Brett Kavanaugh the respect he deserves.
-
(Quote)
No. I mocked Judge Kavanaugh, not the Supreme Court, using an image CM included in a post previous to mine. And when you revisit that post, you'll find that he used insect/pest imagery to defend, not m…
-
(Quote)
A creative critique, CM!
Brett Kavanaugh: nominated to be the next Associate Jus-tick of the Supreme Court.
-
(Quote)
No.
-
(Quote)
By my count, this is the 22nd post since August 9 in which by insinuation or direct reference you have raised your tin foil hat conspiracy about me and alias CD identities. In this latest creation, I count at least five suggestions and…
-
(Quote)
Kavanaugh's most glaring issue is the fact that much of his incendiary comments came in his prepared opening statement, words, he made sure to note, he had written with no one's assistance.
So the conspiracy theories and the o…
-
(Quote)
As I said in another post, reformed, I will no longer accept your invitations into your disputes with other CD posters... not even if the dispute into which you invite me is with my approach to handling my disputes with other CD poster…
-
(Quote)
Her attorneys publicly and on multiple occasions said that. Yes, they wanted the FBI probe first - and didn't get it - but they made very clear that she was willing to sit before the committee and an FBI probe.
-
(Quote)
Gao Lu, every time I think and hope you've finally subdued your urges to lie pathologically about the matter of other CD participants' - particularly my - creating alias IDs, my hopes are cruelly dashed by the appearance of ye…
-
(Quote)
Actually, Dr Ford willingly appeared before the Judiciary Committee, but she also asked for and wanted to appear before an FBI investigation. She got an investigation. The White House and/or the Senate decided that she would not be all…
-
(Quote)
See the links above. A "free rein" investigation would not have been limited by the White House in concert with GOP senators.
An FBI inquiry of Kavanaugh and Blasey Ford would have been MUCH different from their senate appearan…
-
(Quote)
Have you actually READ the Times' story and reviewed its documentation so as to make an informed judgment about it, reformed? Or is your conclusion here the product solely of your politically partisan expectations of the Times?
-
(Quote)
I don't trust President Trump when he said the FBI had "free rein" to run the investigation. CLEARLY he lied about that. CLEARLY the Bureau was walled off from certain witnesses and areas of inquiry. You think they would have CHOSEN no…
-
(Quote)
In the 1980's, the terms Kavanaugh used in his yearbook were sexual terms. "Boofing" was sexual. "Devil's Triangle" was sexual. "FFFFFF" was sexual. Either that, or his vocabulary had more double-entendre in it than anyone's in history…
-
(Quote)
We have to wonder whether there would have been anything to corroborate the allegation had the FBI been allowed the "free rein" in its investigation that President Trump promised:
- Had it interviewed more than nine persons<…
-
(Quote)
I simply want to know who those witnesses are, and how they know "this did not happen" when NO ONE claims any of them, of than Mark Judge, witnessed the assault?
You might also tell us how you know that witnesses told the FBI "…
-
(Quote)
To my knowledge, the FBI report reflects interviews with nine people. According to Dr Ford's attorneys, they provided to the Bureau a list of eight persons who could provide relevant evidence in the matter, NONE of whose names appears …
-
(Quote)
Who are these "witnesses," and how does each of them know that an event NO ONE says they witnessed "did not happen"?
-
(Quote)
So be it. At least we who oppose Kavanaugh's nomination have the comfort President Trump's assurance to the nation last week - that the FBI had "free rein" in its expanded background investigation. At least the Bureau had the authority…
-
(Quote)
... did he "avoid any semblance of partisanship"?
-
(Quote)
... IN FOUR DIFFERENT POSTS I called to your attention the fact that YOU had invited me into this thread, that I had commented here because you had asked me to comment here. Why four posts, not just one? Because you never even acknowle…
-
(Quote)
What was her report's assessment of Judge Kavanaugh's testimony, the judge being the other witness she and the committee heard from?
-
(Quote)
Fake news.
-
(Quote)
I didn't say anything about such a "standard." Mocking is an action taken by the mocker, not the mocker's audience.
- Candidate Trump mocked the NY Times reporter. HE did that. Whether the crowd laughed is not relevant to wh…
-
(Quote)
Those were NOT the "same statements any other objective (president of the United States who claimed to have 'a very open mind' while he or she waited for the results of an FBI background check) would make."
Your claim that he s…
-
(Quote)
And of course... you wouldn't even mention, let alone engage, the substance of my post, or directly address its central claim that a president of the United States who claims to have "a very open mind" on the matter would not be making…
-
(Quote)
When I saw the president's take on Dr Ford last night, I thought of his cruel mocking of a NY Times reporter with disabilities in Heartless America! Comment by Bill_Coley October 2018
