Comments
-
(Quote)
Tell us whether you reach the same conclusion after you review the documents related to her claim.…
-
(Quote)
It's SO unlike you, reformed, not to quote ALL relevant portions of a text, speech, or video, so I'm surprised that you didn't quote the president from a bit earlier in the video:
- He says the purpose of those kits "they se…
-
The new report regarding Sen Warren's DNA today allowed the president to burnish his reputation as a pathological liar. When pressed about his July offer to give $1 million to the charity of Warren's choice if she took a DNA test, today the presi…
-
(Quote)
A couple of reasons come to mind: 1) The president and many other critics have claimed she "made up" her heritage. I, for one, understand wanting to set the record straight when someone falsely claims I made up something about myself …
-
(Quote)
"Revolution" in this context is not of necessity more violent (though it is likely to be, for sure) It's rather a response to "intolerable oppression," in distinction from secession, which Madison clearly views as in keeping with your …
-
(Quote)
Remember the genesis of this exchange. I offered the president's recurring reference to Sen Warren as "Pocahontas" as evidence of his racism. You then said it was only his "making fun of her false claims." But was it?
<…
-
(Quote)
To which post(s) are you responding with this reply?
-
(Quote)
Your comments here prompted me to revisit the issue of secession, Wolfgang - specifically, the issue of the legality of secession.
On the subject, I strongly recommend in What was the "American Civil War" really about? Comment by Bill_Coley October 2018
-
(Quote)
Do you continue to call Sen Warren's claims "false," reformed? If so, on what basis? If DNA analysis from a world renowned expert isn't enough to demonstrate the truth of her claims, what would be?
The Globe article points out …
-
(Quote)
On multiple occasions, I have asked you to read more broadly and deeply than you have to-date on the subject of sexual assault. Your response here prompts me to ask you to do so yet again.
-
-
(Quote)
Once again, reformed, you and I give other CD readers clear witness to our respective approaches to presenting our arguments.
- I offered a 400+ word analysis of both Ginsburg's and Kavanaugh's judicial temperaments that lin…
-
(Quote)
That means if Kavanaugh's judicial temperament as expressed in his partisan political views declared to the Senate Judiciary Committee is to remain approximately comparable to Justice Ginsburg's, then we need to see his public apology,…
-
(Quote)
As either of you decides to post about issues rather than me, I'll welcome the chance to join you in the discussions.
-
(Quote)
OR, you could have used your post to tell me what you meant by your previous post, which could have resolved the entire matter.
The fact that you chose not to clarify the issue, but instead to criticize me, is not surprising. B…
-
(Quote)
-
(Quote)
To my reading, your original post claimed that in court settings, oath-taking implies evidence unreliability, which logically leads to the conclusion that the unreliability of all court testimony is implied because it's all given under…
-
(Quote)
Now that you have finally engaged something resembling the substance of my argument, reformed, we can invite other CD readers to compare the analysis I provided in my posts to the analysis you provided in yours, then decide for themsel…
-
(Quote)
Your posts have lacked substance or engagement on the issues at hand, reformed.
As I posted and then subsequently re-posted in the form of a quotation, the issue I raised with the compromise is that it raised the popula…
-
(Quote)
For the third and final time I'll ask: Where's YOUR analysis, reformed? Not in fact-free, single-sentence outbursts, but in substantive and informed content that shows with rigor and credibility that my analysis is incorrect?
Y…
-
(Quote)
You didn't answer my analysis AT ALL, Gao Lu.
- You didn't answer my question as to what Madison meant by his words.
- You didn't respond to the content of my analysis, specifically my take on the importance of the so…
-
(Quote)
AGAIN I must ask: The best you can do is quibble, incorrectly, with one sentence in my analysis? Where's YOUR analysis? Not in fact-free, single-sentence outbursts, but in substantive and informed content that shows with rigor an…
-
(Quote)
Obviously, the 3/5 compromise didn't change the number of human bodies in ANY state, but it DID change the final count of bodies in states used to determine legislative representation and taxation. Had slaves not been …
-
(Quote)
Northern states had a greater number of eligible voters than did southern states, which means in a presidential election decided by direct popular vote, they would have had more influence on the final result than did southern states.
(Quote)Which means, in your view, EVERY bit of testimony in EVERY criminal trial in the US is "unreliable" because EVERY bit of testimony in EVERY criminal proceeding is taken under oath. And it ALSO means that in your view the fact that Bret…
(Quote)I simply want you to tell me what you think James Madison meant when he said what he said about the electoral impact of "Negro" populations in "Northern" and "Southern" states were the US to elect its presidents by direct popular vote,…
(Quote)(Quote)I think you responded to my reference first to the Kavanaugh case then to the actions of prosecutors "EVERY DAY." I did not mean to connect one case to others. I meant only to say it happens every day that victims statements a…
(Quote)(Quote)
