<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Unitarian — Christian Debate</title>
        <link>https://christiandiscourse.net/index.php?p=/</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 05:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
        <language>en</language>
            <description>Unitarian — Christian Debate</description>
    <atom:link href="https://christiandiscourse.net/index.php?p=/discussions/tagged/unitarian/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
        <title>CD: Where Are We Headed and What Have We Become?</title>
        <link>https://christiandiscourse.net/index.php?p=/discussion/1011/cd-where-are-we-headed-and-what-have-we-become</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>General</category>
        <dc:creator>C Mc</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">1011@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fellow Posters:</strong></p><p>CD is becoming a potential junior satellite of the JWs Organization. A name change may be necessary. <a href="https://christiandiscourse.net/profile/BroRando" rel="nofollow noreferrer ugc"> @BroRando </a> is the only poster in CD who <strong>directs traffic to his website. </strong>He <strong>promotes his WT doctrines</strong> in CD as an extension of his Church. CD is supposed to be a place of discussion, not a dumping ground for one poster's hardened religious beliefs. All because there is no rule to protect one from "denominational" wholesale website dumping.</p><p>Unfortunately, Chairman Jan hasn't addressed the matter. I don't know Jan to be a JW or endorse its teachings, but this apparent free pass is alarming and, to others, sickening. JWs' unloading is equivalent to religious urine, spread over the forums, marking CD as a spot for future territory takeover and ownership, like animals in the wild. Its doctrinal (<a href="https://christiandiscourse.net/profile/BroRando" rel="nofollow noreferrer ugc"><strong>@BroRando, </strong></a> shamefully denies such existence) saturation waters down the varied voices these forums demand openness.</p><p><a href="https://www.christiandiscourse.net/profile/Bill_Coley" rel="nofollow noreferrer ugc">@Bill_Coley</a> appears to defend speak against hard-core religious dumping on CD with a passion. <strong>I have no problem with cutting pasting third-party information or voices. I have long encouraged it. </strong>Elsewhere, <a href="https://christiandiscourse.net/profile/Bill_Coley" rel="nofollow noreferrer ugc"><strong>@Bill_Coley, </strong></a><strong>in </strong>a straw-man faction of distraction, purport that I was against this practice and hypocritical because others did so. When one has the good sense to select from a third-party source, so be it. I do know all of it will not come from one source (<a href="https://christiandiscourse.net/profile/BroRando" rel="nofollow noreferrer ugc"><strong>@BroRando's</strong></a> JWs Website). One religious group unloading is a bit too much for me and some other posters. I mentioned this because it, too, can be a reason others consider leaving the current CD.</p><p><a href="https://christiandiscourse.net/profile/Bill_Coley" rel="nofollow noreferrer ugc"><strong> @Bill_Coley</strong></a>, JWs, and <a href="https://christiandiscourse.net/profile/BroRando" rel="nofollow noreferrer ugc"><strong> @BroRando seem</strong></a> to share a (not so secret) marriage. They share the same core religious "<em>Jesus is not God</em>" doctrinal love. This remaining three-some (<a href="https://christiandiscourse.net/profile/Wolfgang" rel="nofollow noreferrer ugc"><strong> @Wolfgang </strong></a> is on the verge of leaving) <strong>shares the Unitarian doctrinal bed.</strong> The sad truth is, I don't think <a href="https://christiandiscourse.net/profile/BroRando" rel="nofollow noreferrer ugc"><strong>@BroRando </strong></a> knows what's at the base of his religious beliefs. If he knows, he is not a good "witness" about it. The foundation of <strong>NWT bears this religious</strong> stance. Why <a href="https://christiandiscourse.net/profile/Bill_Coley" rel="nofollow noreferrer ugc"><strong> @Bill_Coley fail</strong></a> to acknowledge, at least openly, that birds of feathers (opposing Christ's divinity) flock together? Bill's latest charade of minor disagreements with <a href="https://christiandiscourse.net/profile/BroRando" rel="nofollow noreferrer ugc"><strong> @BroRando </strong></a> is woefully shameful and anemic at best. The tacit slap on the hands, a blind man can see it.</p><p>Those who are not bamboozled by @Bill_Coley's self-declared, moralist, "wanna-to-be" CD mediator, temperamental responder to posters. Some of what JWs and <a href="https://christiandiscourse.net/profile/BroRando" rel="nofollow noreferrer ugc"><strong> @BroRando </strong></a> are promoting is <strong>embarrassing and indefensible</strong> (e.g., 1914, etc.). Even if <a href="https://www.christiandiscourse.net/profile/BroRando" rel="nofollow noreferrer ugc"> @BroRando doesn't</a> know, <a href="https://www.christiandiscourse.net/profile/Bill_Coley" rel="nofollow noreferrer ugc"> @Bill_Coley </a> should have known that to mix a religious group of faulty translators who inserts words, not in the original texts (Greek/Hebrew), the final product will inevitable faulty Bible at best. Bill, you should know better, even if it has "J<em>esus is not God</em>" comfort text in it. When one lies in bed with faulty doctrines, one <strong>wakes up in the morning with heresy. Am I being critical of posters, this site, or sounding the alarm for change? </strong>This and other things on where do we go from here? Next time!<strong> CM</strong></p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
