<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>textus receptus — Christian Debate</title>
        <link>https://christiandiscourse.net/index.php?p=/</link>
        <pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 00:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
        <language>en</language>
            <description>textus receptus — Christian Debate</description>
    <atom:link href="https://christiandiscourse.net/index.php?p=/discussions/tagged/textus-receptus/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
        <title>The longer ending of Mark</title>
        <link>https://christiandiscourse.net/index.php?p=/discussion/445/the-longer-ending-of-mark</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Biblical Studies</category>
        <dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">445@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>The common understanding is that Mark 16:9-20 was not part of the original manuscript.<br />
It is not part of the oldest manuscripts (Vaticanus c. AD 300-325, Sinaiticus c. AD 330-360, and other manuscripts of the Alexandrian text type). It only turns up in the much later Byzantine text type in the 5th century. So most scholars (virtually everyone except KJV-onlyists) reject the authenticity.</p>

<p>Now this:</p>

<p>"Also, towards the conclusion of his Gospel, Mark says: “So then, after the Lord Jesus had spoken to them, He was received up into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of God.”"</p>

<p>Irenaeus of Lyons. (1868–1869). The Writings of Irenæus. (A. Roberts &amp; J. Donaldson, A. Roberts &amp; W. H. Rambaut) (Vol. 1, p. 287). Edinburgh; London; Dublin: T. &amp; T. Clark; Hamilton &amp; Co.; John Robertson &amp; Co.</p>

<p>This is a quote of Mark 16:19, and must have been written prior to AD 202, the year that Irenaeus was martyred.</p>

<p>I'm literally scratching my head right now, wondering whether I should change my mind on the authenticity of the passage…</p>

<p>What do you think: authentic or not?</p>
]]>
        </description>
    </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
