Election dispute law suits at SCOTUS
![[Deleted User]](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/fcddec765be35f238a0844bd23f54b59/?default=https%3A%2F%2Fvanillicon.com%2F8ce8323767a20f0f45db140c4cd2cea1_200.png&rating=g&size=200)
Anyone in the USA know more about what has happened in the meantime to the "election disputes" law suits filed in Dec '20 by president Trump, Lin Wood or Sidney Powell?
The motions for expedition at the time were denied, but the law suits as such were still pending ?
I seem to remember that there was mention made at the time that the Supreme Court had scheduled a hearing sometime in February 2021 (which seemed rather odd since the inauguration date was January 20, 2021. Has said hearing already happened or been cancelled ?
Comments
-
Wolfgang,
You are fishing in a dry pond, no catch here. Trump lost his re election bid and TWICE impeached by the House; Biden is President of the USA. America has spoken. Give it a rest! CM
-
Former Hillary Clinton Attorney Marc Elias spearheaded the Democrat Party’s efforts in the 2020 election to force the courts to change election rules and procedures in key battleground states.
As Breitbart reported, in 2016, Elias was also responsible for funneling money from Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to the Fusion GPS opposition research firm, which produced the fraudulent “Russia dossier.”
Advertisement - story continues below Elias pushed Democrat policies that ensured the 2020 election would be less dependable and less secure. Elias of Perkins Coie was also behind an agreement in Georgia, one filed by Stacey Abrams’ nonprofit, the “New Georgia Project,” (NGP) filed on May 8, 2020. (See full agreement here or here.) This agreement was also signed by the controversial and crooked GOP Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger.
Marc Elias worked with Stacey Abrams in Georgia to ensure Democrats win the election using absentee ballots.
-
No it is scheduled for the 19th. Cowards at the Supreme Court now take up the cases AFTER IT IS TOO LATE.
-
Do you not know these cases are appearing before the Supreme Court this month? What will you say if it comes out the election truly was stolen?
-
@reformed wrote
Do you not know these cases are appearing before the Supreme Court this month? What will you say if it comes out the election truly was stolen?
Is there some kind of statute in the constitution which would remove someone from an office they hold unlawfully, remove imposters? In such case perhaps it actually would be necessary for the imposter to actually have fraudulently taken on the office while it would not have been possible to take action against such imposter prior to taking office because then he/she would not have committed the crime?
-
Reformed,
What will you say WHEN it comes out THAT the election was truly fair, honest, and clean? CM
-
"Obviously, if there was no fraud, there would have been no danger in examining “baseless claims.” Their baselessness could simply have been demonstrated. If the claims of electoral fraud are baseless, there was no need to spilt the country and to cause half of the voting population to distrust the public institutions that are supposed to uphold election integrity.
Even without hard evidence of a stolen election, it is obvious that Trump did not lose to Biden who inspired no enthusiasm and whose campaign events had to be halted due to non-attendance. How did Trump lose the election when on December 29, after two months of his heightened demonization following the November 2020 election, he won the annual Gallup survey as America’s most admired person, ending Obama’s 12-year run. According to the official vote count, Trump received 11 million more votes in 2020 than the number he won in 2016 and three times the black support. In 2020 Trump received 8 million more votes than Obama received in 2012 and Hillary received in 2016. It is not possible that this extraordinary performance is a losing one. And this is his official vote count, not his suppressed actual vote.
No sane person believes that such an uninspiring candidate as Biden garnered 81.2 million votes—15.3 million more popular votes than Obama in 2012 and Hillary in 2016. The Obama-Hillary popular vote of 65 to 66 million is the limit of the Democrat vote. Even Trump’s losing official vote count of 74 million is larger than any winning president in American history other than the fraudulent 2020 Biden vote count.
In other words, no voting machine or other material evidence is needed to see that the 2020 election was stolen.
-
You do realize that Trump has won 2/3 of the cases that were actually tried on the merits of the case right?
-
-
Trump is not the President. Regardless what the outcome of court cases, Mr. Trump will not be President of the USA again. Trump's name is a hiss and a by-word in the US and around the world. The people of Germany can have him. CM
-
In other words, you don't care if the election was stolen or not. You are a worthless piece of scum.
-
@reformed posted:
In other words, you don't care if the election was stolen or not. You are a worthless piece of scum.
Your post, @reformed, clears up a biblical mystery that's eluded me for years: In Matthew 9.11, why do the Pharisees call the "tax collectors and other disreputable sinners" with whom Jesus eats dinner "such scum"? Thanks to you, now I know: They must have not cared whether a recent election had been stolen. I think I knew "scum" was not something anyone would want to be, but I had NO IDEA it was so disgusting as to relate to accusations of electoral apathy.
On the eve of the start of President Trump's second impeachment trial, whose evidence and arguments will certainly reference Mr. Trump's claims of a "stolen" 2020 presidential election, your post serves a noble public interest. We CD forum posters are now better equipped to identify and call out the "worthless piece(s) of scum" to which said evidence will testify. Thank you.
-
Reformed said: "In other words, you don't care if the election was stolen or not. You are a worthless piece of scum".
Reformed,
I pray your child or children don't read your posts here in CD. CM
-
I pray you don't have children to teach them your filth.
